2012
DOI: 10.1071/hc12150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teamwork – general practitioners and practice nurses working together in New Zealand

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Teamwork in primary health care has been encouraged in New Zealand and in the international literature. It may improve work satisfaction for staff, and satisfaction and outcomes for patients. Teamwork may be classified as being multi-, inter- or transdisciplinary and is likely to be influenced by the nature of the work and the organisational context. AIM: To describe and analyse teamwork between general practitioners and practice nurses in New Zealand. METHODS: Data were drawn from a survey of ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are also consistent with findings from previous research [1317]. However, in these studies, the study sample was modest making it difficult to generalise the findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are also consistent with findings from previous research [1317]. However, in these studies, the study sample was modest making it difficult to generalise the findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Few qualitative studies and one study using a quantitative study design have investigated whether practice nurses working more independently may free up GP time and improve GPs’ and their staff’s job satisfaction [1317]. These studies indicate that task delegation and job satisfaction are important aspects of the organisation of general practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining five articles were read thoroughly to appraise them according to the quality criteria. Only one of them did not meet the quality criteria due to a very low response rate, hence 27% of practices had answered the questionnaire ( N  = 276), 26% of GPs ( N  = 277), and 38% of PNs ( N  = 384) [28]. Four studies were included in the review, three of them originated from UK, and one was from Australia (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reveals a paternalistic attitude of MPs instead of recognising the capabilities of NPs in terms of their professional scope of practice. Finlayson and Raymont [33] raise the point that NP employment through MPs will influence their collaborative relationship because the employer-employee relationship is hierarchical by definition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing reviews focus on collaboration in multidisciplinary teams, in hospital settings and collaboration between general nurses and MPs. Collaboration between NPs and MPs in primary health care may differ to other settings and roles, because NPs bring increased autonomy to the clinical setting that may challenge the traditionally MP dominated domain of primary health care, where nurses have long been working to support the MP and perform delegated tasks [24,33]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%