Communication in the disciplines (CID) is a model of situated pedagogy that prepares students for the communication demands of their professional work. A defining feature of CID is its ''situatedness.'' Communication is meant to uphold, not disrupt, disciplinary norms surrounding communication outcomes, genres, and assessment. However, by upholding rather than critically examining and shifting disciplinary norms, CID runs the risk of being an unwitting ally in the maintenance of gendered inequities in the disciplines and professions. We argue that CID, as both situated and representative of contradiction, can highlight tensions internal to disciplinary activities, thus positioning CID to be an agent of expansion. We draw from feminist theory and socialization and genre research to show how CID instructors and instruction can facilitate engagement with the contradictions and tensions characterizing the CID classroom to promote a more inclusive community of practice.Communication in the disciplines (CID) is a unique educational approach where disciplines collaborate for the purpose of enhancing and aligning students' communication competence with the perceived needs of their discipline and future professions. In part, CID socializes students through preparing them for the demands of their professional work. A defining feature of CID is its ''situatedness.'' Communication is meant to uphold, not disrupt, disciplinary norms surrounding communication outcomes, genres, and assessment (Dannels, 2002(Dannels, , 2005a, allowing CID practitioners to be responsive to industries' needs. However, disciplines and professions are gendered. Given this, several gendered contradictions emerge when adopting the tenets of CID. Yet