1994
DOI: 10.1016/0955-3886(94)90174-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical and clinical experience with Protein A Immunoadsorption columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…IA is a specific technique for removing isoagglutinins and is part of the ABO-I desensitisation protocol in most European centers at present [44]. IA can faster to remove DSA than DFPP [45], and compared to plasmapheresis, IA allows not only a more specific but also a more effective clearance of circulating immunoglobulins without the side effects associated with the substitution of FFP or albumin [46,47]. However, the higher costs associated with the use of IA indicates its use in high-risk populations (i.e., hyperimmune or ABO-I patients, pretransplantcross-match positivity, AAMR) [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IA is a specific technique for removing isoagglutinins and is part of the ABO-I desensitisation protocol in most European centers at present [44]. IA can faster to remove DSA than DFPP [45], and compared to plasmapheresis, IA allows not only a more specific but also a more effective clearance of circulating immunoglobulins without the side effects associated with the substitution of FFP or albumin [46,47]. However, the higher costs associated with the use of IA indicates its use in high-risk populations (i.e., hyperimmune or ABO-I patients, pretransplantcross-match positivity, AAMR) [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(59) Similar columns for removal of donor-specific alloantibody would require large amounts of donor HLA antigens, which is technically and financially unfeasible at the current time. In general, IA can remove up to 87% of plasma IgG and over 50% of the IgA and IgM per treatment, as well as Ig-bound complement proteins (54, 57, 58, 60). IA has several advantages over TPE: it does not remove clotting factors, requires no substitution of plasma, antibodies against previously encountered antigens are somewhat preserved, and has the potential of reusable adsorption systems (58, 60, 61).…”
Section: Emerging Targets For Clinical Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, IA can remove up to 87% of plasma IgG and over 50% of the IgA and IgM per treatment, as well as Ig-bound complement proteins (54, 57, 58, 60). IA has several advantages over TPE: it does not remove clotting factors, requires no substitution of plasma, antibodies against previously encountered antigens are somewhat preserved, and has the potential of reusable adsorption systems (58, 60, 61). Similar to TPE, however, IA does not alter IgG synthesis or redistribution from tissue compartments, and additional B and plasma cell depleting therapies are needed for sustained DSA reduction (58).…”
Section: Emerging Targets For Clinical Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,10) We investigated the in vivo pharmacokinetics and disposition property of ctDNA in a previous study, to evaluate its safety of use as an immunoadsorptive carrier material for therapy. 11,12) Although it was proved ctDNA can be effectively eliminated in plasma and would not accumulate in the body of animal, in the practical application, the patients who have leprosy or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may undergo synergistic cure with other drugs together with ctDNA, or other kind of drugs were simultaneously or successively used against other diseases and medical conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%