2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2886-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical and operational underpinnings of malaria elimination from Sri Lanka

Abstract: Malaria was eliminated from Sri Lanka in 2012, and the country received WHO-certification in 2016. The objective of this paper is to describe the epidemiology of malaria elimination in Sri Lanka, and the key technical and operational features of the elimination effort, which may have been central to achieving the goal, even prior to schedule, and despite an ongoing war in parts of the country. Analysis of information and data from the Anti Malaria Campaign (AMC) of Sri Lanka during and before the elimination p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mild adverse reactions were reported during treatment with CQ as given in Table 2, This coupled with the fact that the area where they were resident had a high prevalence of the primary vector of malaria in Sri Lanka, constituted a risk for resumption of transmission. Even the extremely thorough surveillance and case management system for malaria in place in the country at present [1,10] Although in the particular situation described here, MRT was executed and was well tolerated by the individuals with no occurrence of serious adverse events, the procedure faced many operational and technical challenges. Tools to screen for G6PD activity prior to treatment with PQ, the only registered anti-relapse medicine today, were not optimal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mild adverse reactions were reported during treatment with CQ as given in Table 2, This coupled with the fact that the area where they were resident had a high prevalence of the primary vector of malaria in Sri Lanka, constituted a risk for resumption of transmission. Even the extremely thorough surveillance and case management system for malaria in place in the country at present [1,10] Although in the particular situation described here, MRT was executed and was well tolerated by the individuals with no occurrence of serious adverse events, the procedure faced many operational and technical challenges. Tools to screen for G6PD activity prior to treatment with PQ, the only registered anti-relapse medicine today, were not optimal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were the only tests that were available and feasible to use in this situation, and neither were quantitative. Therefore, using the approach of an abundance of caution, almost a quarter of the group of individuals had to be excluded from PQ treatment on the grounds that they tested positive for Surveillance, both parasitological and entomological is one of the key strategies used by the AMC to maintain zero transmission since the elimination of malaria in 2012 [1]. With 378 imported malaria cases being diagnosed between 2013-2019, the country remains vulnerable to the re-introduction of malaria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A signi cant feature in the prevention of reintroduction (POR) phase of malaria in Sri Lanka is the high receptivity and vulnerability in parts of the country owing to the persistence of malaria vectors and the high rate of importation of malaria cases [1]. Even though an effective surveillance system is in operation, these conditions impose a signi cant risk of malaria re-introduction post-elimination [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the countries that have already eliminated have lower receptivity, and they maintain elimination through excellent clinical surveillance, focal case investigation, and in some cases entomological surveillance and response (6). In contrast, many of the remaining malaria-endemic countries have much higher intrinsic transmission potential and are surrounded by other countries facing the same issues, making their path toward elimination technically, operationally, and financially challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%