Technical and Social Approaches to Study Shoreline Change of Kuakata, Bangladesh

Abstract

In recent years, shoreline determination has become an issue of increasing importance and concern, especially at the local level, as sea level continues to rise. This study identifies the rates of absolute and net erosion, accretion, and shoreline stabilization along the coast of Kuakata, a vulnerable coastal region in south-central Bangladesh. Shoreline change was detected by applying remote sensing and geographic information system (RS-GIS)-based techniques by using Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM), Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) satellite images at 30-m resolution from 1989, 2003, 2010, and 2020. The band combination (BC) method was used to extract the shoreline (i.e., land-water boundary) due to its improved accuracy over other methods for matching with the existing shoreline position. This study also used participatory rural appraisal (PRA) tools which revealed the societal impacts caused by the shoreline changes. Coupling RS-GIS and PRA techniques provides an enhanced understanding of shoreline change and its impacts because PRA enriches the RS-GIS outcomes by contextualizing the findings. Results show that from 1989 to 2020, a total of 13.59 km2 of coastal land was eroded, and 3.27 km2 of land was accreted, suggesting that land is retreating at about 0.32 km2 yr–1. Results from the PRA tools support this finding and demonstrate that fisheries and tourism are affected by the shoreline change. These results are important in Kuakata, a major tourist spot in Bangladesh, because of the impacts on fisheries, recreation, resource extraction, land use planning, and coastal risk management.

Actionable Information in Flood Risk Communications and the Potential for New Web-Based Tools for Long-Term Planning for Individuals and Community

“…Perennially the world's most ubiquitous and expensive natural hazard, flooding increases in notoriety as populations and economic investment in coastal and other flood-prone areas continue to climb sharply (Dewan et al, 2006;Bushra et al, 2021). One way to enhance flood risk preparedness is through improved flood risk communication (Maidl and Buchecker 2015), especially that which provides actionable information such as previous, current, and future flood damage (Mostafiz et al, 2021a) and hazard risk, mitigation and adaptation approaches, and cost-benefit analysis.…”

A data-driven spatial approach to characterize the flood hazard

“…The perilous and expensive nature of flood hazards calls for concurrent improvements in the ability of scientists to measure their risk (Kron, 2005 ). Moreover, rapid increases in the population living in marginal areas relative to the flood hazards (Moulds et al, 2021 ), amid the consequences of land use changes such as in Bangladesh (Dewan et al, 2007 ), Belgium (Akter et al, 2018 ), India (Guhathakurta et al, 2011 ), China (Shen et al, 2021 ), the United States (Qiang et al, 2017 ), and elsewhere, a changing climate (Zhou et al, 2012 ; Kreibich et al, 2015 ), sea level rise (Nicholls et al, 1999 ; Bushra et al, 2021 ), and local factors such as subsidence (Mostafiz et al, 2021a ) and extreme weather events (Guhathakurta et al, 2011 ), underline the urgent need for accelerated improvements in flood risk assessment (Merz et al, 2014 ; Mostafiz, 2022 ). Yet proportionately little advancement has been made.…”

Present vs. Future Property Losses From a 100-Year Coastal Flood: A Case Study of Grand Isle, Louisiana

“…The most comprehensive recent study on ESLR is by Oppenheimer et al (2019), as part of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), who reported a rise of 1-2 mm year −1 in most regions through the twentieth century, with current rates of 3-4 mm year −1 . Predictions of future ESLR hinge on the extent to which societal changes may mitigate or increase the warming (Bushra et al, 2021). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021) defines several "representative concentration pathways" (RCPs) scenarios, named for the number of Watts per square meter of additional radiative forcing that is assumed to occur in that scenario.…”