2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1709.09753
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Design Report for the Paul Scherrer Institute Experiment R-12-01.1: Studying the Proton "Radius" Puzzle with μp Elastic Scattering

Abstract: Beam-Line FIG. 3. Implementation of detectors in the πM1 area in a Geant4 [10] simulation. The beam strikes the thin scintillator beam hodoscope and three GEM chambers, passes through a hole in the annular veto scintillator, enters the cryotarget vacuum chamber and strikes one of the targets, then exits the vacuum chamber and goes through the beam monitor. Scattered particles are detected by two symmetric spectrometers, each with two straw chambers wrapped in RF shielding and two planes of scintillator paddles. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, for µp scatterings, radiative corrections, especially TPE corrections, may play an impotart role in the extraction of FFs and charge radius. It is thus instructive to investigate the validity of our results in elastic µp scatterings such as MUSE [13,14]. For more future planned ep and µp scattering experiments, we recommend the recent report [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, for µp scatterings, radiative corrections, especially TPE corrections, may play an impotart role in the extraction of FFs and charge radius. It is thus instructive to investigate the validity of our results in elastic µp scatterings such as MUSE [13,14]. For more future planned ep and µp scattering experiments, we recommend the recent report [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several recent experimental poposals aim at carrying out high precision measurements of low energy e ± p (and µ ± p) scattering cross sections. PRad [11,12] experiment at JLab, and MUSE [13,14] experiment at PSI are two such experiments. In particular, MUSE experiment plans to mesure the elastic µ ± p scattering cross sections at momentum transfer as low as |q 2 | ∼ 0.0002 − 0.08GeV 2 , where q means the four-momentum transfer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the main parameters of hydrogen targets used in current nuclear physics experiments at electron accelerators such as Darklight [37], OLYMPUS [38,39], PRad [40,41], MUSE [42,43], and A1 at MAMI [35,44,45,46,47] is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Hydrogen Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with widely discussed two-photon exchange [8], the important source of uncertainties for both lepton and anti-lepton scattering is from the real photon emission accompanying any process with the charge particle scattering, as well as the additional virtual particle contributions. Due to smallness of muon beam momentum at MUSE experiment in PSI [9], as well as scattering by extremely small angles in PRAD-II experiment at Jefferson Lab [10], all calculations have a e-mail: afanas@gwu.edu b e-mail: ily@hep.by to be performed beyond the ultrarelativistic approximation, i.e. retaining lepton's mass during the entire calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While for purely elastic scattering at a given beam energy the four-momentum transfer Q 2 is in oneto-one correspondence with a lepton scattering angle, this is not the case for radiative events. It is therefore of critical importance to understand the role of QED radiative corrections (RC) in different kinematic scenarios: fixed momentum transfer Q 2 vs fixed scattering angle of the detected lepton (as done in MUSE [9] or in high-resolution spectrometers with small angular acceptance used in some of Jefferson Lab experiments).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%