2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical evaluation of in vivo abdominal fat and IMCL quantification using MRI and MRSI at 3 T

Abstract: Objectives-To develop protocols that measure abdominal fat by MRI and calf muscle lipids by MR spectroscopy (MRS) at 3 Tesla, and to examine the correlation between these parameters and insulin sensitivity.Materials and Methods-Ten non-diabetic subjects, five insulin-sensitive (IS) and five insulinresistant (IR), were scanned at 3T. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were segmented semi-automatically from abdominal imaging. Intramyocellular lipids (IMCL) in calf muscles were qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). As previously described, the peaks were fitted to obtain their line widths and areas. MRS analyses were performed with automated fitting and quantification software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). As previously described, the peaks were fitted to obtain their line widths and areas. MRS analyses were performed with automated fitting and quantification software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using methods previously described, the four peaks were fitted with Voigt models to estimate their areas and line widths (Fig. 4) (16–19). Bone marrow fat content (FC) of each vertebra was calculated according to the equation: FC = [(UL+SL+RL)/(UL+SL+RL+W)] × 100% where UL, SL, RL, and W are the areas of unsaturated lipids, saturated lipids, residual lipids, and water, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26, 27, 28 Each guinea pig was anesthetized using an induction protocol of intraperitoneal injection of medetomidine (0.25 mg kg −1 ) followed by inhalation of 4% isoflurane in O 2 . The concentration of isoflurane was decreased to 2.5–3% for maintenance of anesthesia during the imaging session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%