2018
DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2016.2637374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Foundations of a DPLL-Based SAT Solver for Propositional Gödel Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An output equivalent CNF may be of exponential size with respect to the size of the input formula; we had laid no restrictions on use of the distributivity law (4) during translation to conjunctive normal form. To avoid this disadvantage, we have devised translation to CNF via interpolation using new atoms, which produces an output CNF of linear size at the cost of being only equivalent satisfiable to the input formula [1]. A similar approach exploiting the renaming subformulae technique can be found in [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19].…”
Section: Translation To Clausal Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An output equivalent CNF may be of exponential size with respect to the size of the input formula; we had laid no restrictions on use of the distributivity law (4) during translation to conjunctive normal form. To avoid this disadvantage, we have devised translation to CNF via interpolation using new atoms, which produces an output CNF of linear size at the cost of being only equivalent satisfiable to the input formula [1]. A similar approach exploiting the renaming subformulae technique can be found in [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19].…”
Section: Translation To Clausal Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that if the estimated upper bound on the space complexity is equal to the estimated upper bound on the time complexity for some algorithm, then it will not be explicitly stated. Since our computational framework is only slightly different from that in [1], analogous considerations will be shorten. Let n s ∈ N (n s can be viewed as an offset in the memory) and E be either a term or a formula or an order clause or a finite theory or a finite order clausal theory.…”
Section: A a Computational Point Of Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The procedure of Davis, Putnam, Logemann, and Loveland (algorithm) (DPLL) [15][16][17][18] is a prominent algorithm for solving the SAT problem in propositional calculus. In [19], we have extended DPLL procedure to Gödel logic. In Introduction to [19], we have briefly described the history of DPLL procedure together with its extensions to signed logic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], we have extended DPLL procedure to Gödel logic. In Introduction to [19], we have briefly described the history of DPLL procedure together with its extensions to signed logic. The underlying rule of the DPLL procedure has a branching nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%