The transit time of water in catchments is a fundamental descriptor of catchment behavior. If we think of "age" as a label that is attached to any water particle resident within a hydrologic system (e.g., a catchment) and that tracks the time elapsed since arrival (e.g., as precipitation), the transit time is the particle's age when it leaves the system (e.g., as discharge or evapotranspiration). While slow to gain ground as a standard metric, transit times and their analyses now abound in the literature due in part to the increased availability of tracer data used to estimate water transit times. As a result, transit time is now a common means to improve process representation in models and a strong test of model output realism. Once, the review presented in McGuire and McDonnell (2006) was the starting point for newcomers interested in getting to grips with catchment transit time modeling. However, the explosion of the transit time literature since the mid-2000s-with new studies, terminology, theory, and mathematical approaches-means a newcomer to the field now is met with the challenge of absorbing these developments and harmonizing them with earlier approaches.Over the last ∼15 yr, there have indeed been departures and advancements beyond what was summarized by McGuire and McDonnell (2006). That review provided the first "evaluation and review of the transit time literature in the context of catchments and water transit time estimation". It was motivated by "new and emerging interests in transit time estimation in catchment hydrology and the need to distinguish approaches and assumptions used in groundwater applications from catchment applications". At that time, hydrologists were mainly using time-invariant, lumped parameter transit time approaches largely focused on low temporal resolution