2020
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: Comparative evaluation of 3 methods for the quantification of nonesterified fatty acids in bovine plasma sampled prepartum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As biomarker of inflammation, we determined the concentration of the positive acute phase protein Haptoglobin ( Hp ; Phase Haptoglobin Assay TP-801, Tridelta Development Limited, Maynooth, Ireland). All biomarkers related to nutrient utilization and inflammation were determined using a small-scale biochemistry analyzer (CataChemWell-T; Catachem Inc.) previously validated for cattle (Abuelo et al, 2020). The analyzer was calibrated every week using the assay manufacturer’s calibrators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As biomarker of inflammation, we determined the concentration of the positive acute phase protein Haptoglobin ( Hp ; Phase Haptoglobin Assay TP-801, Tridelta Development Limited, Maynooth, Ireland). All biomarkers related to nutrient utilization and inflammation were determined using a small-scale biochemistry analyzer (CataChemWell-T; Catachem Inc.) previously validated for cattle (Abuelo et al, 2020). The analyzer was calibrated every week using the assay manufacturer’s calibrators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma was removed and placed into 2-mL microcentrifuge tubes (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). All samples were refrigerated, and plasma NEFA concentration was determined within 24 h by Central Star Cooperative (Grand Ledge, MI) using a 96-well plate protocol validated for cattle (14). The test has a sensitivity (95%CI) of 88.9% (67.2-96.9%) and a specificity (95% CI) of 100.0% (97.1-100.0%) for the identification of excessive lipid mobilization pre-calving (14).…”
Section: Data Collection and Sample Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples were refrigerated, and plasma NEFA concentration was determined within 24 h by Central Star Cooperative (Grand Ledge, MI) using a 96-well plate protocol validated for cattle (14). The test has a sensitivity (95%CI) of 88.9% (67.2-96.9%) and a specificity (95% CI) of 100.0% (97.1-100.0%) for the identification of excessive lipid mobilization pre-calving (14). A convenience sample size that included the results from all the cows sampled between September 2015 and March 2020 whose actual calving date was between 4 and 14 days [mean (SD) = 7.4 (2.1) days] after sampling (n = 1,532) were included in the study.…”
Section: Data Collection and Sample Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of NEFA and BHB are considered biomarkers for NEB during the periparturient period ( Abuelo et al, 2020 ) and their associations with disease incidence, milk production, and reproduction have been studied intensively ( Duffield et al, 2009 ; Ospina et al, 2010b ; Chapinal et al, 2011 ). For both biomarkers, critical thresholds have been determined for the prepartum and postpartum period ( McArt et al, 2013 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantification of NEFA concentration, however, still requires submission of serum or plasma to specialized laboratories, leading to delays and considerable costs ($11–17; McArt et al, 2013 ; Abuelo et al, 2020 ). Most recently, 2 studies evaluated devices that allowed NEFA measurements independent of diagnostic laboratories with promising results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%