Technical Note: Density correction to improve CT number mapping in thoracic deformable image registration

Abstract

Purpose To improve the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) number mapping inside the lung in deformable image registration with large differences in lung volume for applications in vertical CT imaging and adaptive radiotherapy. Methods The deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) CT image and the end of exhalation (EE) phase image in four‐dimensional CT of 14 thoracic cancer patients were used in this study. Lung volumes were manually delineated. A Demons‐based deformable registration was first applied to register the EE CT to the DIBH CT for each patient, and the resulting deformation vector field deformed the EE CT image to the DIBH CT space. Given that the mass of the lung remains the same during respiration, we created a mass‐preserving model to correlate lung density variations with volumetric changes, which were characterized by the Jacobian derived from the deformation field. The Jacobian determinant was used to correct the lung CT numbers transferred from the EE CT image. The absolute intensity differences created by subtracting the deformed EE CT from the DIBH CT with and without density correction were compared. Results The ratio of DIBH CT to EE CT lung volumes was 1.6 on average. The deformable registration registered the lung shape well, but the appearance of voxel intensities inside the lung was different, demonstrating the need for density correction. Without density correction, the mean and standard deviation of the absolute intensity difference between the deformed EE CT and the DIBH CT inside the lung were 54.5 ± 45.5 for all cases. After density correction, these numbers decreased to 18.1 ± 34.9, demonstrating greater accuracy. The cumulative histogram of the intensity difference also showed that density correction improved CT number mapping greatly. Conclusion Density correction improves CT number mapping inside the lung in deformable image registration for difficult cases with large lung volume differences.

Anatomic change over the course of treatment for non–small cell lung cancer patients and its impact on intensity-modulated radiation therapy and passive-scattering proton therapy deliveries

“…The Demons-based deformable registration has been validated in multiple scenarios with reasonably good results [22][23][24][25][26]. Here, we illustrated the comparison of deformed contour and clinical approved contour for a IMRT intensity-modulated (photon) radiation therapy, PSPT passive-scattering proton therapy, GTV gross tumor volume, CTV clinical target volume, ART adaptive radiotherapy typical PSPT patient who underwent ART at week 4 in Fig.…”

A conditional registration network for continuous 4D respiratory motion synthesis

“…A backpropagation scheme is used to drive the DVF solution to minimize the objective in Equation (1) Finally, when generating images with the estimated DVFs, volume compensation intensity correction is applied: the CT number of the warped image is multiplied by the Jacobian determinant of the corresponding DVF to counter the volume change caused by the expansion or compression of tissues. 12…”

“…|∇v| < 1 indicates volume shrinkage, and |∇v| > 1 indicates volume expansion at the voxel. Following a common convention for volume-compensated intensity correction, the Hounsfield unit (HU) at the warped image is multiplied by the corresponding Jacobian determinant 12,15 :…”

Please Place Your Seat in the Full Upright Position: A Technical Framework for Landing Upright Radiation Therapy in the 21st Century

“…DIR from supine CT to upright CBCT could transfer contours. Research has been undertaken to correct for large anatomical changes and lung changes in DIR, which has the potential to benefit supine-to-upright deformation ( 47 , 48 ). The issues of image handling, registration and fusion may be the area requiring the most attention to realise routine upright radiotherapy.…”