2023
DOI: 10.5194/acp-23-7495-2023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: Intercomparison study of the elemental carbon radiocarbon analysis methods using synthetic known samples

Abstract: Abstract. The accurate identification of elemental carbon (EC) sources in aerosol based on radiocarbon (14C) depends on the method of EC isolation. The lack of aerosol EC reference materials with “true” 14C values makes it impossible to evaluate the accuracy of various methods for the analysis of 14C-EC in aerosols. In this study, EC isolation methods were evaluated by using samples of mixed biomass burning, vehicle exhaust, and coal combustion. The results show that 14C-EC was not only related to the isolatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the δ 13 C− Δ 14 C values measured by the HyPy and BPCA methods are comparable as the HyPy and BPCA methods shared similar dual-carbon isotope compositions in the same reference materials (Table S8, see detailed method comparison in Text S6). ,, However, the comparison of the two techniques in the reference substance is currently limited to one reference material (Text S6 and Table S8). More investigation is therefore needed on BC method comparison in terms of both quantification and dual-carbon isotope compositions, especially for the method comparison in multiple commercial/environmental reference materials with different phase states.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, the δ 13 C− Δ 14 C values measured by the HyPy and BPCA methods are comparable as the HyPy and BPCA methods shared similar dual-carbon isotope compositions in the same reference materials (Table S8, see detailed method comparison in Text S6). ,, However, the comparison of the two techniques in the reference substance is currently limited to one reference material (Text S6 and Table S8). More investigation is therefore needed on BC method comparison in terms of both quantification and dual-carbon isotope compositions, especially for the method comparison in multiple commercial/environmental reference materials with different phase states.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual carbon is defined as BC in the present study. BC determined by HyPy can overcome issues associated with the interference of BC from organic carbon charring due to the reduced environment. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation