2009
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: Occlusal fingerprint analysis: Quantification of tooth wear pattern

Abstract: Information about food ingestion and mastication behavior during the lifespan of an individual is encoded in the dental occlusal wear pattern. To decode this information, we describe a new method called occlusal fingerprint analysis (OFA). Structural parameters of wear facets on the occlusal surface of teeth are quantified from digitized casts for the interpretation of occlusal aspects. The OFA provides an individual three-dimensional dental occlusal compass that indicates the major pathways of interaction bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
165
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
165
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…M1 wear areas were manually outlined on each digital 3D surface models and were labeled according to the wear area terminology and numbering system created by Kullmer et al, (2009). Areas that were affected by wear were then grouped into their respective masticatory cycle phases, that is, phase I buccal areas (1, 1.1, 2, 2.1, 3, 4), phase II (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 10.1), and phase I lingual areas (5, 6, 7, 8) (Kay & Hiiemae, 1974).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M1 wear areas were manually outlined on each digital 3D surface models and were labeled according to the wear area terminology and numbering system created by Kullmer et al, (2009). Areas that were affected by wear were then grouped into their respective masticatory cycle phases, that is, phase I buccal areas (1, 1.1, 2, 2.1, 3, 4), phase II (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 10.1), and phase I lingual areas (5, 6, 7, 8) (Kay & Hiiemae, 1974).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After adjusting experience-based functional data in the articulator, the mandibular dental row was manually occluded against the maxillary to generate attrition on antagonistic crowns. The movements, constrained through the condyle box configurations, allowed all possible directions of relief guided jaw movements out of maximum intercuspation as described by the dental occlusal compass (Douglass and DeVreugd, 1997; Schulz and Winzen, 2004;Schulz, 2008;Kullmer et al, 2009). This included combinations of protrusion, laterotrusion, mediotrusion, retrusion and ISS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His ''Angle Class I'' defines a normal occlusal relationship which produces the common pattern of contact positions characteristic of the bunodont dryopithecine tooth morphology (Maier and Schneck, 1981;Ulhaas et al, 2007;Kullmer et al, 2009). A stereotypic motion of the lower jaw was described as a general feature of the primate masticatory cycle Kay, 1972, 1973;Kay and Hiiemae, 1974;Kay, 1977;Maier, 1977Maier, , 1978Maier, , 1984, from which a maximum of 13 complementary facet pairs develop on the molar occlusal surface (Maier and Schneck, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations