2008
DOI: 10.3826/jhr.2008.3296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TECHNICAL NOTES Air uptake along the lower nappe of a spillway aerator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper and lower boundaries of the domain were set at two conditions: 1) C values of 95% and 5%, and 2) C values of 90% and 10%. Lima et al (2008) showed that the measured air discharges are substantially lower than the air discharges evaluated from the concentration profiles. Previous results of Wilhelms and Gulliver (2005), when evaluating entrained air from concentration profiles for upper surface aeration, showed that corrections must be made because the measurements involve air among water parcels of the surface distortions, not absorbed by the water.…”
Section: Upper Boundarymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upper and lower boundaries of the domain were set at two conditions: 1) C values of 95% and 5%, and 2) C values of 90% and 10%. Lima et al (2008) showed that the measured air discharges are substantially lower than the air discharges evaluated from the concentration profiles. Previous results of Wilhelms and Gulliver (2005), when evaluating entrained air from concentration profiles for upper surface aeration, showed that corrections must be made because the measurements involve air among water parcels of the surface distortions, not absorbed by the water.…”
Section: Upper Boundarymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous results of Wilhelms and Gulliver (2005), when evaluating entrained air from concentration profiles for upper surface aeration, showed that corrections must be made because the measurements involve air among water parcels of the surface distortions, not absorbed by the water. Lima et al (2008) suggested that a similar effect influenced the measurements along the lower nappe, with the addition of the effect of the spray that emanates from the aerator lip as water. Substantial sprays could account for water measurement throughout the air pocket, affecting the air discharge results.…”
Section: Upper Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%