A linearised model system matrix B linearised model control matrix C L aerodynamic perturbation in roll moment C M aerodynamic perturbation in pitch moment C T aerodynamic perturbation in thrust p,q,r perturbed angular velocity components along airframe axes, rad/s r radial position on rotor disc, m R rotor radius, m U perturbation velocity vector, U = (u,v,w), dimensionless on ΩR t non-dimensional time u,v,w perturbed velocity components along airframe axes, dimensionless on ΩR u control vector v 0 component of induced velocity, mean, ms -1 v c1 component of induced velocity, longitudinal, ms -1 v s1 component of induced velocity, lateral, ms -1 v m wake mass flow velocity, ms -1 V general mass-flow parameter, dimensionless on ΩR V m mass-flow parameter, V m /ΩR V m+ mass-flow parameter for normal working state, dimensionless on ΩR V m-mass-flow parameter for windmill-brake state, dimensionless on ΩR V T non-dimensional total flow at rotor disc, dimensionless on ΩR
ABSTRACTThe dynamic inflow model is a powerful tool for predicting the induced velocity distribution over a rotor disc. On account of its closed form and simplicity, the model is especially practical for studying flight mechanics or for designing control systems for helicopters. Scant attention has, however, been paid so far in utilising the dynamic inflow model to analyse an autorotating rotor, which is different from a powered rotor in the geometric relation between the direction of the inflow and the rotor disc. Autorotation is an abnormal condition for helicopters, but for gyroplanes it is the normal mode of operation. Therefore the theoretical discussion on an autorotating rotor is of importance not only to improve the understanding of present gyroplanes, but also in the development of new gyroplanes and to analyse the windmill-brake state of helicopters. Dynamic inflow modelling is reviewed from first principles, and this identifies a modification to the mass flow parameter. A qualitative assessment of this change indicates that it is likely to have a negligible impact on the trim state of rotorcraft in autorotation, but a significant effect on the dynamic inflow modes in certain flight conditions. This is confirmed by numerical simulation, although considerable differences only become apparent for steep descents with low forward speed. It is concluded that while modification of the mass flow parameter is perhaps mathematically accurate, for practical purposes it is required only in a limited area of the flight envelope of autorotating rotorcraft.