1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf00588002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical problems in the micropuncture determination of nephron filtration rate and their functional implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because no method of assessing the activity of the TG feedback system is entirely without limitations, we employed three different approaches. A frequently cited concern about techniques requiring collection of tubule fluid is that artifactual changes in SNGFR may be introduced by the collection technique through alteration of intratubular pressure (particularly during collections from the proximal tubule) (21). In experiment 1 we attempted to avoid altering pressure in Bowman's space by collecting fluid from the distal end of the proximal tubule and by not applying suction on the collection pipette.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because no method of assessing the activity of the TG feedback system is entirely without limitations, we employed three different approaches. A frequently cited concern about techniques requiring collection of tubule fluid is that artifactual changes in SNGFR may be introduced by the collection technique through alteration of intratubular pressure (particularly during collections from the proximal tubule) (21). In experiment 1 we attempted to avoid altering pressure in Bowman's space by collecting fluid from the distal end of the proximal tubule and by not applying suction on the collection pipette.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done because loop flow and the effects of TG feedback on GFR and tubule fluid flow rate are eliminated by the technique of collecting proximal fluid used in experiment 1. Consequently, the true rate of flow in the proximal tubule may be overestimated by this technique (21 5-nl/min increment from the pump setting first eliciting a decrease in stop-flow pressure was also studied. In this fashion each nephron was studied at a minimum of five pump settings in addition to the baseline setting (2 nl/min).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collections were made under 'controlled suction'. Although controversy exists about the validity of measuring SNGFR by sample collection from the proximal tubule (Davis, Schnermann & Horster, 1972;Knox, Ott, Cuche, Gasser & Haas, 1974;Navar, Burke, Robinson & Clapp, 1974;Schnermann, Davis Wunderlich, Levine & Horster, 1971), it was necessary to use this site for sampling. In the youngest Wistar rats used in these studies (20 days old), there are but a few distal tubules on the surface.…”
Section: Micropuncture Studies and Tubular Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that GFR calculated from distal tubular fluid collections are consistently lower than those calculated from proximal tubular fluid collections in that nephron, when distal tubular sodium concentration are presumably very low due to the proximal oil block (57,58). Others have failed to substantiate these findings (59).…”
Section: Microinjection Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%