2010
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i25.3183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical problems produced by the Bravo pH test in nonerosive reflux disease patients

Abstract: The Bravo capsule pH test involves a low but non-negligible rate of technical problems, a fact that must always be considered by physicians.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 However, optimal threshold cut-off values are yet to be standardized. Penagini et al 11 in 2007, explained that a pH monitoring study is considered normal when esophageal acid exposure is in the normal range and the SI is less than 0.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…21 However, optimal threshold cut-off values are yet to be standardized. Penagini et al 11 in 2007, explained that a pH monitoring study is considered normal when esophageal acid exposure is in the normal range and the SI is less than 0.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The presence of an abnormal composite pH score in either the first or second 24-hour had a sensitivity of 93% but specificity and positive predictive value of 100% for a diagnosis of GERD. 21 On the other hand, there is limited data on normal pH thresholds from Asia compared to the West. In a recent study by Ang et al, 7 they determined the following data in a cohort of Singaporeans (age range 22-50, with two-thirds males and two-thirds of Chinese ethnicity): total percentage time pH < 4 at 24 hours was 7.4%, at 48 hours was 6.3% and overall 48 hours study was 5.8% (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations