2014
DOI: 10.1038/srep03678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Variations in Low-Input RNA-seq Methodologies

Abstract: Recent advances in RNA-seq methodologies from limiting amounts of mRNA have facilitated the characterization of rare cell-types in various biological systems. So far, however, technical variations in these methods have not been adequately characterized, vis-à-vis sensitivity, starting with reduced levels of mRNA. Here, we generated sequencing libraries from limiting amounts of mRNA using three amplification-based methods, viz. Smart-seq, DP-seq and CEL-seq, and demonstrated significant technical variations in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the amounts of RNA used in the RT step were well within the manufacturers' specifications, we observed a significant concentrationdependent variability. A similar effect has also been identified in next-generation sequencing, where the use of limiting amounts of mRNA results in significant technical variation, with inefficient amplification of the majority of low to moderately expressed transcripts masking subtle biological differences (23 ). This is rather disconcerting, given the increasing interest in carrying out RNA expression analysis on single cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although the amounts of RNA used in the RT step were well within the manufacturers' specifications, we observed a significant concentrationdependent variability. A similar effect has also been identified in next-generation sequencing, where the use of limiting amounts of mRNA results in significant technical variation, with inefficient amplification of the majority of low to moderately expressed transcripts masking subtle biological differences (23 ). This is rather disconcerting, given the increasing interest in carrying out RNA expression analysis on single cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…RNA is bound to an advanced silica gel membrane under optimal buffering conditions [21]. A simple two-step washing protocol ensures that PCR inhibitors such as proteins or divalent cations are completely removed, leaving high-quality RNA to be eluted in Milli-Q water [22].…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present different method are used to produce fragmented genomic DNA, such as sonication, nebulization, enzymatic digestion, and hydrodynamic shearing. Each method has specific compensation and limitations [30]. Enzymatic digestion is simple and rapid, but it is frequently tricky to precisely control the fragment length distribution [31].…”
Section: Library Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tissue is held by a toothed forceps and the lesion is detached from the base of the skin using a pair of fine iris or sharp gradle scissors. This method of biopsy produces small and often hypo-pigmented macule that may be hard to identify (Bolognia et al, 2003). …”
Section: Snip Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are six key biopsy techniques to perform biopsy of the skin. The selection to the type of technique employed depends on the type and size of lesion (Bolognia et al, 2003).…”
Section: Conventional Skin Sampling For Diagnostics In Dermatology 12mentioning
confidence: 99%