Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7 2005
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044704-9/50019-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technico-economic feasibility study of CO2 capture, transport and geo-sequestrationA case study for France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absolute values of cost estimate are not given here and those given elsewhere [17] should be viewed with caution as they are made to an accuracy of ±30%. Moreover, metal market and contract prices have been rising for two years and this will probably lead to a much higher cost for the power plant if based on 2007euro values but will probably not lead to significant change in differential comparisons between the different options.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Absolute values of cost estimate are not given here and those given elsewhere [17] should be viewed with caution as they are made to an accuracy of ±30%. Moreover, metal market and contract prices have been rising for two years and this will probably lead to a much higher cost for the power plant if based on 2007euro values but will probably not lead to significant change in differential comparisons between the different options.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hence, equipping power plants with CCS technology is only of interest when long-distance CO 2 transport is required. In both cases, CO 2 feedstock supply can be regarded as energy-intensive, rated at 13.1 ± 2.8 and 2.04 ± 0.26 kWh t CO 2 –1 km –1 for flue gas and purified CO 2 , respectively. ,,,, Hence, the use of power plants and carbon suppliers, appearing beneficial at first, from an environmental point of view, should thus be treated with caution for industrial-scale systems. Indeed, this energy-intensive delivery of CO 2 as upstream carbon feedstock was identified in this study, but ignored in other life-cycle studies .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, flue gas CO 2 is first captured using CCS technology, resulting in a power plant electrical power output reduction of 18.2 ± 5.0%, corresponding to, in the case of the natural gas power plant chosen for this study, 474 kWh t CO 2 –1 (at annual electrical power and CO 2 outputs of 204 GWh and 7.8 × 10 5 tonnes, respectively) . Subsequently, the concentrated CO 2 stream is transported to the site of microalgae cultivation, requiring 2.04 ± 0.26 kWh t CO 2 –1 km –1 . , A minor part of microalgae carbon demand is met by seawater dissolved inorganic carbon …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%