Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution for solving complex situations in multi-criteria optimization of the tracking channels of GPS baseband telecommunication receivers

Jumaah, F. M.; Zaidan, A. A.; Zaidan, B. B.; Bahbibi, R.; Qahtan, M. Y.; Sali, Aduwati

doi:10.1007/s11235-017-0401-5

Cited by 62 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It uses a group of qualitative and quantitative methods to overcome complex decision cases, considering multiple criteria, which might be conflicting [231,232]. MCDM can enhance the quality of decisions; it provides the decision-makers to choose right decisions more effectively and rationally than the traditional processes [233][234][235]. MCDM includes (A) ranking available alternatives and (B) determining the best alternative from available set of alternatives [236,237].…”

Section: Mcdm: Definition and Importancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Real-Time Remote-Health Monitoring Systems: a Review on Patients Prioritisation for Multiple-Chronic Diseases, Taxonomy Analysis, Concerns and Solution Procedure

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Remotely monitoring a patient's condition is a serious issue and must be addressed. Remote health monitoring systems (RHMS) in telemedicine refers to resources, strategies, methods and installations that enable doctors or other medical professionals to work remotely to consult, diagnose and treat patients. The goal of RHMS is to provide timely medical services at remote areas through telecommunication technologies. Through major advancements in technology, particularly in wireless networking, cloud computing and data storage, RHMS is becoming a feasible aspect of modern medicine. RHMS for the prioritisation of patients with multiple chronic diseases (MCDs) plays an important role in sustainably providing high-quality healthcare services. Further investigations are required to highlight the limitations of the prioritisation of patients with MCDs over a telemedicine environment. This study introduces a comprehensive and inclusive review on the prioritisation of patients with MCDs in telemedicine applications. Furthermore, it presents the challenges and open issues regarding patient prioritisation in telemedicine. The findings of this study are as follows: (1) The limitations and problems of existing patients' prioritisation with MCDs are presented and emphasised. (2) Based on the analysis of the academic literature, an accurate solution for remote prioritisation in a large scale of patients with MCDs was not presented. (3) There is an essential need to produce a new multiple-criteria decisionmaking theory to address the current problems in the prioritisation of patients with MCDs.

show abstract

Section: Mcdm: Definition and Importancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The advantages and disadvantage of the popular MCDM methods are shown in Table 2 [22,229,235,252,[256][257][258][259][260][261][262].…”

Section: Critical Analysis For Mcdm Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Real-Time Remote-Health Monitoring Systems: a Review on Patients Prioritisation for Multiple-Chronic Diseases, Taxonomy Analysis, Concerns and Solution Procedure

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…La solución ideal positiva maximiza los criterios de beneficio y minimiza los criterios de costo, mientras que la solución ideal negativa maximiza los criterios de costo y minimiza los criterios de beneficio (Behzadian, Otaghsara, Yazdani e Ignatius, 2012). Al igual que el AHP, la técnica TOPSIS se ha utilizado para diferentes aplicaciones: Jumaah et al (2018) la utilizaron en la evaluación de los modos de operación de sistemas de posicionamiento global, Walczak y Rutkowska (2017) en la clasificación de proyectos en un presupuesto participativo, y Senouci, Mushtaq, Hoceini y Mellouk (2016) en la selección de interfaces de redes de comunicaciones móviles inalámbricas.…”

Section: Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified

Localización de locales comerciales: un enfoque de selección multicriterio

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The decision regarding the location of commercial premises is one of strategic nature, as the different alternatives that may be available must be studied according to multiple factors, that way, it can be considered a complex Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) process. This document is intended to propose a methodology for the selection of location of commercial premises that integrates the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process or fuzzy AHP, which is used to weight the selection criteria under the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), in order to select the best option for the location according to the qualifications that are obtained from all the alternatives. A case study is presented, with the purpose of illustrating the applicability of the methodology that has been proposed, in which five shopping centers are used as location choices, according to four criteria: infrastructure, cost of renting, accessibility to customers, and commercial potential. The weights that were achieved by each criterion were 11.2 %, 21.0 %, 14.3 %, and 53.5 %, respectively. Finally, it not only demonstrates the applicability of the methodology for the case, but also, the scope that it can have in other business sectors, since it is presented as a reliable and effective way to select the best option among a group of alternatives, depending on the different key criteria.

show abstract

“…[48][49][50][51]94 Thus, the prioritization process is a complex multi-attribute decision-making problem, in which each patient is considered an alternative for the decision-maker. [52][53][54][55] The procedures give rise to an important question with regard to the prioritization given the mentioned issues. In this context, a new intelligent decision-making methodology is needed to overcome the mentioned challenges by prioritizing patients with COVID-19.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-Biological Laboratory Examination Framework for the Prioritization of Patients with COVID-19 Based on Integrated AHP and Group VIKOR Methods

Albahri

Al‐Obaidi

Zaidan

et al. 2020

Int. J. Info. Tech. Dec. Mak.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has a tremendous effect on people’s lives worldwide, and the number of infected patients increases daily. The healthcare sector is affected by a large number of patients with COVID-19, and a solution is urgently needed to avert the risk of deteriorating patients in terms of prioritizing patients based on their health conditions. Prioritization of patients with COVID-19 is a complex and multi-criteria decision-analysis (MCDA) problem due to (i) multiple biological laboratory examination criteria, (ii) criteria importance and (iii) trade-off amongst the criteria. This study presents a new multi-biological laboratory examination framework for prioritizing patients with COVID-19 on the basis of integrated MCDA methods. The experiment was conducted on the basis of three phases. In the first phase, patient datasets containing eight biological laboratory examination criteria for six patients with COVID-19 were derived and discussed. The outcome of this phase was used to propose a decision matrix on the basis of the intersection between “biological laboratory examination criteria” and “COVID-19 patients list”. In the second phase, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was utilized to set the subjective weights for the biological laboratory examination criteria by respiratory experts. In the last phase, the VIekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) method was adopted to prioritize patients in the context of individual and group decision making (GDM). Results showed that (1) the integration of AHP–VIKOR method based on individual and GDM contexts was effective for solving prioritization problems for patients with COVID-19, and (2) the prioritization results of patients with COVID-19 showed no variation in the internal and external VIKOR GDM contexts. The proposed multi-biological laboratory examination framework can differentiate between the mild and serious or critical condition of patients with COVID-19 by prioritizing them based on integrated AHP–VIKOR methods. In conclusion, medical sectors can use the proposed framework to differentiate the health conditions of infected patients and to assign appropriate care with prompt and effective treatment.

show abstract

Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution for solving complex situations in multi-criteria optimization of the tracking channels of GPS baseband telecommunication receivers

Cited by 62 publications

References 33 publications

Real-Time Remote-Health Monitoring Systems: a Review on Patients Prioritisation for Multiple-Chronic Diseases, Taxonomy Analysis, Concerns and Solution Procedure

Real-Time Remote-Health Monitoring Systems: a Review on Patients Prioritisation for Multiple-Chronic Diseases, Taxonomy Analysis, Concerns and Solution Procedure

Localización de locales comerciales: un enfoque de selección multicriterio

Multi-Biological Laboratory Examination Framework for the Prioritization of Patients with COVID-19 Based on Integrated AHP and Group VIKOR Methods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About