2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01010.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technique for washing nectar from the flowers of Tasmanian leatherwood (Eucryphia lucida Eucryphiaceae)

Abstract: The technique for extracting floral nectar using micropipettes is often unsuited to flowers where nectar is produced in very small volumes and/or where nectar is highly viscous. An alternative technique for washing the viscous nectar from the flowers of Tasmanian leatherwood, Eucryphia lucida (Labill.) is described. Here, two washes with a known volume of distilled water removed 95% of total floral sugar. Using such a washing technique on exposed and bagged E. lucida flowers provided information on nectar prod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The nectar was removed every four hours, during the day only (at 06.00 h, 10.00 h, 14.00 h and 18.00 h) for two consecutive days. Nectar was collected using Mallick's (2000) washing technique. The microclimatic condition of the study area (≤ 20% RH and mean daytime temperatures of 30 -45 o C) resulted in rapid evaporation, making the nectar very concentrated and viscous (> 72% sugar, g sugar/100 g solution), and leading to rapid crystallization on the surface of the flowers.…”
Section: Repeated Nectar Removal and Measurement Of Nectar Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nectar was removed every four hours, during the day only (at 06.00 h, 10.00 h, 14.00 h and 18.00 h) for two consecutive days. Nectar was collected using Mallick's (2000) washing technique. The microclimatic condition of the study area (≤ 20% RH and mean daytime temperatures of 30 -45 o C) resulted in rapid evaporation, making the nectar very concentrated and viscous (> 72% sugar, g sugar/100 g solution), and leading to rapid crystallization on the surface of the flowers.…”
Section: Repeated Nectar Removal and Measurement Of Nectar Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pouring a known volume of distilled water over the nectaries of a flower. The collected nectar-water solution can be used for analysis Low-high Nunez (1977), Mallick (2000), Morrant et al (2009)…”
Section: Rinsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suction of raw nectar up a syringe or narrow tube, manually or with the aid of a pipette. Nectar volume can be quantified and analysed by expelling the nectar from the tube/syringe High Corbet (2003), Lanza, Smith, Suellen, and Cash (1995), Mallick (2000), Wykes (1952)…”
Section: Micropipettes and Microsyringesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mais cette méthode fournit un nectar artificiellement dilué et elle n'est pas exempte de modifier la composition chimique du nectar par lésion des tissus de la fleur (Mesquida et al, 1988). Des méthodes de lavage et de rinçage des fleurs avec de l'eau distillée ont été proposées pour échantillonner le nectar des fleurs contenant des petits volumes de nectar inférieurs à 1 mL qui sont difficiles à échantillonner (Mallick, 2000 ;Morrant et al, 2009). Ces méthodes permettent d'échantillonner plus de nectar que celle utilisant les microcapillaires dans ce type de fleur, mais la question de savoir laquelle de ces méthodes reflète le plus fidèlement la quantité de nectar pouvant être effectivement extraite par les insectes floricoles lors de leur visite reste posée (Petit et al, 2011).…”
Section: Mesurer La Sécrétion Nectarifèreunclassified