Technique of generalization of results of comparative historical and legal research

Abstract

This study investigates the technique of organising the information obtained during the comparative historical and legal analysis. The main methods of data systematisation include classification and typologization. Classification is manifested in the division of objects into certain classes and can be based on a variety of criteria. Therewith, each individual classification should be performed based only on one feature. In contrast to the classification, typologization can be performed on a set of essential features and is aimed at understanding the essence of the phenomena under study. Any historical and legal typologization depends on the selected criteria. The result of comparative historical and legal analysis can be the production of entire arrays of information, to organise which it is advisable to use methods of cluster analysis. Cluster analysis constitutes a set of techniques that allow classifying multidimensional observations, and its purpose is to create clusters – groups of similar objects. This study also provides an algorithm for using cluster analysis. All the above methods of information systematisation serve as the basis for further evaluation of the data obtained, the main element of which is an explanation. It is in the process of explanation that the essential aspects and relations of the compared historical and legal objects are covered and the internal causal relationship between the studied state and legal phenomena is established. Evaluation of the results of comparative historical and legal research does not end with a simple explanation, but can also continue in scientific forecasting, the logical basis of which is the method of modelling. The process of modelling at the stage of systematisation and evaluation of the results of comparative historical and legal research takes place in several stages, which are also covered in this study

Problem of National Identity in Ukrainian Military Terminology

“…Despite the utility statement in the introduction − "to meet the need of the language practice of the Ukrainian militaries from a private to general", its aim is much broader the information set in basic dictionary parts reveals its implicit meaning: a) in register of nominatives which point at "historical inheritance of the Ukrainian military service. b) in a rich source basis of the dictionary with "two-volume dictionaries published both in Ukraine and abroad that became the important contribution to the Ukrainian special vocabulary which underwent various deformations in Soviet Ukraine" (Buriachok et al, 1995); "military regulations from the liberation movement in Ukraine 1917-1921" (Buriachok et al, 1995; military law compilations etc; c) in providing Ukrainian equivalents to the Russian terms (often synonymic) which support the revival of the national identity on the different language levels (lexical, derivational, morphological) and the qualitative enrichment (neologization) of the Ukrainian military terminology (UMT) (Honcharenko & Shyhal, 2021;Tatsiy, 2021).…”