2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques for Analysis of Quantitative Ethnobiological Data: Use of Indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance value (IV), which measures the proportion of informants who cited a species as the most important, was obtained by the formula:IV = ns/nwhere ns = number of informants that considered species "s" the most important and n = total number of informants (see Silva et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance value (IV), which measures the proportion of informants who cited a species as the most important, was obtained by the formula:IV = ns/nwhere ns = number of informants that considered species "s" the most important and n = total number of informants (see Silva et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of techniques that quantify knowledge, such as diversity indices, evenness of the informant [ 15 , 16 ], and the use value [ 17 19 ], are selected for their practicality, speed, and ease of use, and fit in the concept of techniques called “consensus of informants” [ 20 , 21 ]. However, they are unable to estimate the effective use of plant species [ 21 23 ]. Gaugris and Van Rooyen [ 22 ] have ratified the above information in a study on the use of wood in home construction in Maputaland, South Africa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To document the importance of A. speciosa for local extractivists, indices were used to analyze the relative importance of a plant for a particular culture (Silva et al 2014). The indices included the plant part value (PPV) index, which measures the degree of consistency among informants with regard to the parts used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also used the use-diversity value (UDV) index, which measures the importance of the use categories and how they contribute to the local use value. It is obtained from the number of recorded indications for a category divided by the total number of indications for all categories (see Monteiro et al 2006;Silva et al 2014). For this analysis, the uses cited by the respondents from the two communities were grouped into the following eight use categories: human food, animal feed, handicraft, fuel, construction, cosmetic, medicinal, and other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%