2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.2006.385265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques for Missing Value Recovering in Imbalanced Databases: Application in a Marketing Database with Massive Missing Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some authors use missingness of data as a feature [48,49,7] that can be used to define phenotypes. But more often researches focus on imputation schemes, or methods for interpolate missing values [50,51,21,52-54]. And finally, some phenotyping methods just use essentially raw, unaltered EHR data [55,19,56] with the assumption that the models are flexible enough to manage and model the data complexities automatically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some authors use missingness of data as a feature [48,49,7] that can be used to define phenotypes. But more often researches focus on imputation schemes, or methods for interpolate missing values [50,51,21,52-54]. And finally, some phenotyping methods just use essentially raw, unaltered EHR data [55,19,56] with the assumption that the models are flexible enough to manage and model the data complexities automatically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed the new knowledge produced from reused and shared ontologies is still very limited (Guarino, 1998) (Blanco et al, 2008) (Coulet et al, 2008) (Sharma and Osei-Bryson, 2008) (Cardoso and Lytras, 2009). To the best of our knowledge, in spite of successful ontology approaches to solve some KDD related problems, such as, algorithms optimization (Kopanas et al, 2002) (Nogueira et al, 2007), data pre-processing tasks definition (Bouquet et al, 2002) (Zairate et al, 2006) or data mining evaluation models (Cannataro and Comito, 2003) (Brezany et al, 2008), the research to the ontological KDD process assistance is sparse and spare. Moreover, mostly of the ontology development focusing the KDD area focuses only a part of the problem, intending only to modulate data tasks (Borges et al, 2009), algorithms (Nigro et al, 2008, or evaluation models (Euler and Scholz, 2004) (Domingues and Rezende, 2005).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%