2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30232-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques in Archaeological Geology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ERT could be useful in detecting deeper targets since its penetration depth and resolution can be improved by using many electrodes and small intervals (Garrison, ). In a controlled experiment in Otay Mesa, California, USA, ERT successfully detected from the surface a tunnel dug through compacted soil, 11 m deep and 1.5 m in diameter (Butler, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERT could be useful in detecting deeper targets since its penetration depth and resolution can be improved by using many electrodes and small intervals (Garrison, ). In a controlled experiment in Otay Mesa, California, USA, ERT successfully detected from the surface a tunnel dug through compacted soil, 11 m deep and 1.5 m in diameter (Butler, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground‐penetrating radar, GPR, has been applied to archaeological contexts since the late 1970s, although little published material has explored the application of GPR in identifying the extent of fossil‐rich deposits (with one of the earliest papers by Main & Hammond, ). In our study, GPR was selected as an appropriate geophysical tool to evaluate the extent of fluvial deposits in our study area, most notably for its utility in guiding excavations and providing non‐destructive analyses (Sharma, ; Garrison, ; Kvamme, ; Conyers, ). GPR studies used to characterize fluvial stratigraphic environments (e.g., Leclerc & Hicken, ; Skelly, Bristow, & Ethridge, ; Patidar et al., ) as well as geoarchaeological studies within fluvial contexts have also been long demonstrated (e.g., Słowik, ; Wright et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical resistivity is useful for detecting buried artifacts when the object is in stark contrast with the surrounding soil matrix (Drahor, 2006), such as organic trash piles in coarse‐textured, sandy soils and stone debris in fine‐textured clay and silt soils (Bevan, 2006). Electrical resistivity is also used for detection of foundations, old roads, hearths, and rubble (Collins and Molyneaux, 2003; Gaffney and Gater, 2003; Garrison, 2003). Combining surveys made with different geophysical instruments with soil sampling increases the detection of buried features and improves accuracy of the survey (Bevan, 2006; Drahor, 2011; Garrison, 2003; Zheng et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical resistivity is also used for detection of foundations, old roads, hearths, and rubble (Collins and Molyneaux, 2003; Gaffney and Gater, 2003; Garrison, 2003). Combining surveys made with different geophysical instruments with soil sampling increases the detection of buried features and improves accuracy of the survey (Bevan, 2006; Drahor, 2011; Garrison, 2003; Zheng et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation