Techniques used for the isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles: results of a worldwide survey

Organogenesis is a complex and dynamic process requiring reciprocal communication between different cell types. In the thyroid, thyrocyte progenitors secrete the angiocrine factor, VEGFA, to recruit endothelial cells. In return, endothelial cells promote thyrocyte organisation into spherical follicular structures, which are responsible for thyroid hormone synthesis and storage. Medium conditioned by endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) can promote follicle formation and lumen expansion (i.e. folliculogenesis) in an ex vivo culture system of thyroid lobes. Here, we postulated that endothelial cells instruct thyrocyte progenitors by producing extracellular vesicles (EVs). We found that medium conditioned by EPCs contain EVs with exosomal characteristics and that these vesicles can be incorporated into thyrocyte progenitors. By mass spectrometry, laminin peptides were abundantly identified in the EV preparations, probably co-sedimenting with EVs. Laminin-α1 silencing in EPC abrogated the folliculogenic effect of EVs. However, density gradient separation of EVs from laminins revealed that both EV-rich and laminin-rich fractions exhibited folliculogenic activity. In conclusion, we suggest that endothelial cells can produce EVs favouring thyrocyte organisation into follicles and lumen expansion, a mechanism promoted by laminin-α1.

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Extracellular vesicles from endothelial progenitor cells promote thyroid follicle formation

Degosserie

Heymans

Spourquet

et al. 2018

“…Rapidly increasing research in this field is accompanied by the demand for reproducible, time-efficient and economic isolation methods. A recent survey conducted by Gardiner et al revealed that although ultracentrifugation (UC) remains the most commonly used isolation method, other approaches have gained preference when starting volume is limited [1]. Capturing EVs from blood-based biofluids such as serum and plasma is of particular interest for clinical applications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of serum extracellular vesicle isolation methods for profiling miRNAs by next‐generation sequencing

Buschmann

Kirchner

Hermann

et al. 2018

203

165

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are intercellular communicators with key functions in physiological and pathological processes and have recently garnered interest because of their diagnostic and therapeutic potential. The past decade has brought about the development and commercialization of a wide array of methods to isolate EVs from serum. Which subpopulations of EVs are captured strongly depends on the isolation method, which in turn determines how suitable resulting samples are for various downstream applications. To help clinicians and scientists choose the most appropriate approach for their experiments, isolation methods need to be comparatively characterized. Few attempts have been made to comprehensively analyse vesicular microRNAs (miRNAs) in patient biofluids for biomarker studies. To address this discrepancy, we set out to benchmark the performance of several isolation principles for serum EVs in healthy individuals and critically ill patients. Here, we compared five different methods of EV isolation in combination with two RNA extraction methods regarding their suitability for biomarker discovery-focused miRNA sequencing as well as biological characteristics of captured vesicles. Our findings reveal striking method-specific differences in both the properties of isolated vesicles and the ability of associated miRNAs to serve in biomarker research. While isolation by precipitation and membrane affinity was highly suitable for miRNA-based biomarker discovery, methods based on size-exclusion chromatography failed to separate patients from healthy volunteers. Isolated vesicles differed in size, quantity, purity and composition, indicating that each method captured distinctive populations of EVs as well as additional contaminants. Even though the focus of this work was on transcriptomic profiling of EV-miRNAs, our insights also apply to additional areas of research. We provide guidance for navigating the multitude of EV isolation methods available today and help researchers and clinicians make an informed choice about which strategy to use for experiments involving critically ill patients.

“…Several methods have been used for EV isolation, but each method has its advantages and disadvantages. We have tested DUC, the most commonly used isolation technique [18], as it is a simple approach and has a rather high throughput. Furthermore, it has the advantage that EVs are concentrated in a pellet suitable for undiluted resuspension in SPP for further coagulation analysis.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of procoagulant activity in extracellular vesicles isolated by differential ultracentrifugation

Nielsen

Kristensen

Pedersen

et al. 2018

Tissue factor (TF) is the main initiator of coagulation and procoagulant phospholipids (PPL) are key components in promoting coagulation activity in blood. Both TF and PPL may be presented on the surface of extracellular vesicles (EVs), thus contributing to their procoagulant activity. These EVs may constitute a substantial part of pathological hypercoagulability that is responsible for triggering a higher risk of thrombosis in certain patients. The aim of this study was to describe a model system for the isolation of EVs required for investigating their effect on coagulation. Differential ultracentrifugation (DUC) with and without a single washing step was used to isolate and evaluate the procoagulant capacity of EVs from healthy volunteers through analysis of thrombin generation and PPL activity. Ultracentrifugation at 20,000 × g and 100,000 × g resulted in pellets containing larger vesicles and smaller vesicles, respectively. Isolation yield of particle concentration was assessed by nanoparticle tracking analysis. Immunoelectron microscopy and western blotting revealed vesicles positive for the commonly used EV-marker CD9. Plasma proteins and lipoproteins were co-isolated with the EVs; however, application of a washing step clearly diminished the amount of contaminants. The isolated EVs were capable of enhancing thrombin generation, mainly due to PPL predominantly present in pellets from 20,000 × g centrifugation, and correlated with the activity measured by a PPL activity assay. Thus, DUC was proficient for the isolation of EVs with minimal contamination from plasma proteins and lipoproteins, and the setup can be used to study EV-associated procoagulant activity. This may be useful in determining the procoagulant activity of EVs in patients at potentially increased risk of developing thrombosis, e.g. cancer patients.Abbreviations: TF: Tissue factor; PL: Phospholipids; EVs: Extracellular vesicles; FXa: Activated coagulation factor X; TGA: Thrombin generation assay; PPL: Procoagulant phospholipids; DUC: Differential ultracentrifugation; NTA: Nanoparticle tracking analysis; TEM: Transmission electron microscopy; SPP: Standard pool plasma; CTI: Corn trypsin inhibitor; 20K: 20,000 × g; 100K: 100,000 × g; FVIII: Coagulation factor VIII