2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic analysis of forest biomass blends gasification for small-scale power production facilities in the Azores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sines municipality is also the preferred location for the unit as it resides within a region with an estimated forest biomass yield from 20,151 to 26,756 tons/year (Figure 3), covering for the plant's average consumption of 11,324 tons/year (considering a baseload annual operation of 7160 h). 42 The small-scale power plant's feedstock will rely essentially on residual forest biomass blends (up to 90% of the total fuel burned) comprising essentially eucalyptus, pine trees, and some oak. Eucalyptus and pine trees will make up most of the fuel blend being the most predominant species in the region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sines municipality is also the preferred location for the unit as it resides within a region with an estimated forest biomass yield from 20,151 to 26,756 tons/year (Figure 3), covering for the plant's average consumption of 11,324 tons/year (considering a baseload annual operation of 7160 h). 42 The small-scale power plant's feedstock will rely essentially on residual forest biomass blends (up to 90% of the total fuel burned) comprising essentially eucalyptus, pine trees, and some oak. Eucalyptus and pine trees will make up most of the fuel blend being the most predominant species in the region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 The use of biomass blends is beneficial as it allows increasing supply efficiency while avoiding feedstock disruption. 42 The power plant's provisioning policy is within the acceptable performance range and does not hinder the attained gas quality. 45 Furthermore, the gasifying performance behavior in dealing with several forestry residues has already been thoroughly studied by research groups in similar fluidized bed gasifiers at various scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies tried to evaluate the economic profitability of biomass gasification CHP plants [89][90][91][92][93][94]. Colantoni et al [89] used Montecarlo simulation to evaluate important economic indicators, like Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Payback Time (PBT), of three different gasification CHP power plants (13.6 kW, 136 kW, and 1.9 MW nominal electrical capacity).…”
Section: Cost Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a PBT range for 3.5 to 5.5 was evaluated. Cardoso et al [91] assessed the energetic valorization of forest biomass blends in the archipelago of the Azores through small scale biomass gasifiers. The results showed that 100 kW units were economically impracticable, while the 1000 kW units were found to be economically feasible with an NPV of 486 k€, IRR of 17.44% and PBP of 7.4 years.…”
Section: Cost Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardoso et al 64 has carried out a feasibility analysis of forest biomass‐based gasifier system for Azores Island. The study found a 1000 kW capacity system more feasible compared with 100 kW and the system is found to be very sensitive toward sale tariff rate and electricity production.…”
Section: Various Combinations Of Biomass Hresmentioning
confidence: 99%