2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-017-0261-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic evaluation of gas separation processes for long-term operation of CO2 injected enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors identified key factors that have the most significant impact on the economic efficiency of such projects. An approach to assessing the technical and economic efficiency of CCUS-ECBM projects is proposed by Kim et al [20]. The results showed that coalbed methane can become a serious competitor to a natural gas.…”
Section: Analysis Of Co 2 Sequestration Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors identified key factors that have the most significant impact on the economic efficiency of such projects. An approach to assessing the technical and economic efficiency of CCUS-ECBM projects is proposed by Kim et al [20]. The results showed that coalbed methane can become a serious competitor to a natural gas.…”
Section: Analysis Of Co 2 Sequestration Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CBM-gas two-phase flow in the fractures follows the Darcy's law. To simulate the CBM productivity, the motion of the flow can be extended as [12,13]:…”
Section: Motion Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the regenerator, the stripped CO 2 is discharged from the top stage through a reverse-absorption reaction. The captured CO 2 is then pressurized to 25 bar through a multi-Table 1 Flue gas of the coal fired power plant adopted in this study (Yakub et al, 2014) Temperature (Kim et al, 2011) 1.21 Temperature of CO 2 lean stream [°C] (Kim et al, 2011) 40 Produced CO 2 purity [%] (Kim et al, 2018) 99 Produced CO 2 pressure [bar] (Dai et al, 2014) 25 Produced CO 2 temperature [°C] (Kim et al, 2018) 40…”
Section: Description Of Process and Design Speci Cationmentioning
confidence: 99%