2012
DOI: 10.2172/1059463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technoeconomic Evaluation of MEA versus Mixed Amines for CO2 Removal at Near-Commercial Scale at Duke Energy Gibson 3 Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, where q h GT , q c GT , w el GT are the specific heating, cooling, and electricity required per unit volume of amine, assumed to be constant and equal to, 31 respectively, 0.27 MJ/kg, 0.40 MJ/kg, and 46.5 kWh/kg.…”
Section: Scrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where q h GT , q c GT , w el GT are the specific heating, cooling, and electricity required per unit volume of amine, assumed to be constant and equal to, 31 respectively, 0.27 MJ/kg, 0.40 MJ/kg, and 46.5 kWh/kg.…”
Section: Scrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more complete description of the project, consult the original Technoeconomic Evaluation. 17 We modeled the process using Aspen Plus, Version 7.0 without Rate-Based Distillation. Therefore, our model will calculate the results of the absorption and stripping columns assuming all species and phases are in equilibrium at each stage.…”
Section: Background and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%