2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological and Organizational Arrangements Sparking Effects on Individual, Community and Organizational Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the teacher must keep a balance between teacher control and learner autonomy in order to retain the effectiveness of self-regulated learning (Drexler, 2010). Similar arguments have been presented in organizational and workplace learning domains where a balance between individually driven learning and organizational guidance has been captured in concepts of knowledge maturation (Kaschig et al, 2012;Schmidt et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Yet, the teacher must keep a balance between teacher control and learner autonomy in order to retain the effectiveness of self-regulated learning (Drexler, 2010). Similar arguments have been presented in organizational and workplace learning domains where a balance between individually driven learning and organizational guidance has been captured in concepts of knowledge maturation (Kaschig et al, 2012;Schmidt et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Yet, the teacher must keep a balance between teacher control and learner autonomy in order to retain the effectiveness of self-regulated learning (Drexler, 2010). Similar arguments have been presented in organizational and workplace learning domains where a balance between individually driven learning and organizational guidance has been captured in concepts of knowledge maturation (Kaschig et al, 2012;Schmidt et al, 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Its theoretical roots lie in knowledge creation theories. Moreover, its design was based on a number of additional empirical studies, such as in-depth case studies of workplace and organizational learning (e.g., Kaschig et al, 2012) and a number of design-based research activities in several contexts . These studies contributed to the understanding of how individual, group, and organizational learning are intertwined in knowledge creation.…”
Section: The Sssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies contributed to the understanding of how individual, group, and organizational learning are intertwined in knowledge creation. To name just a few examples, the studies found out how professionals make sense of experiences and informally learn from them (Dennerlein et al, 2014), how help-seeking happens in professional (Santos et al, 2016), and how organizations create boundary objects to facilitate knowledge sharing (Kaschig et al, 2012). The SSS was designed by deriving requirements from the tools and services needed to support these empirical studies.…”
Section: The Sssmentioning
confidence: 99%