2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58624-9_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological Approaches to Detecting Online Disinformation and Manipulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Online misinformation and disinformation involve numerous approaches such as disinformation diffusion trend analysis and identification, dynamic budget allocation (DBA) strategies [35], computer-supported approaches for detecting disinformation [36], [37], and propagation network-based feature extraction [38]- [40]. These techniques attempt to analyze the propagation of disinformation, mitigate its impact, and detect fake news.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Online misinformation and disinformation involve numerous approaches such as disinformation diffusion trend analysis and identification, dynamic budget allocation (DBA) strategies [35], computer-supported approaches for detecting disinformation [36], [37], and propagation network-based feature extraction [38]- [40]. These techniques attempt to analyze the propagation of disinformation, mitigate its impact, and detect fake news.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DBA methods integrate refutation, media regulation, and social bot detection to limit the proportion of disinformation-supportive accounts on online social networks (OSNs) [35]. Computer-supported systems predominantly apply ML methods to perform factchecking, subject identification, text style analysis, and message filtering in social media channels [37]. On the other hand, propagation network-based feature extraction collects the propagation properties of bogus news for detection and applying ML for classification [42].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%