Technological Capabilities to Assess Digital Excellence in Hospitals in High Performing Health Care Systems: International eDelphi Exercise

Abstract

Background Hospitals worldwide are developing ambitious digital transformation programs as part of broader efforts to create digitally advanced health care systems. However, there is as yet no consensus on how best to characterize and assess digital excellence in hospitals. Objective Our aim was to develop an international agreement on a defined set of technological capabilities to assess digital excellence in hospitals. Methods We conducted a two-stage international modified electronic Delphi (eDelphi) consensus-building exercise, which included a qualitative analysis of free-text responses. In total, 31 international health informatics experts participated, representing clinical, academic, public, and vendor organizations. Results We identified 35 technological capabilities that indicate digital excellence in hospitals. These are divided into two categories: (a) capabilities within a hospital (n=20) and (b) capabilities enabling communication with other parts of the health and social care system, and with patients and carers (n=15). The analysis of free-text responses pointed to the importance of nontechnological aspects of digitally enabled change, including social and organizational factors. Examples included an institutional culture characterized by a willingness to transform established ways of working and openness to risk-taking. The availability of a range of skills within digitization teams, including technological, project management and business expertise, and availability of resources to support hospital staff, were also highlighted. Conclusions We have identified a set of criteria for assessing digital excellence in hospitals. Our findings highlight the need to broaden the focus from technical functionalities to wider digital transformation capabilities.

Driving digital health transformation in hospitals: a formative qualitative evaluation of the English Global Digital Exemplar programme

“…54 However, requiring providers to rapidly achieve particular benchmarks may restrict markets (favouring existing vendors whose products are already aligned with HIMSS EMRAM) and limit innovation as it leaves little room for experimentation and innovation around local priorities. 55 Although characterising digital maturity was not the focus of this paper, these results, building also on existing literature and our previous work surrounding the definition of technological characteristics of digital excellence in hospitals, 56 serve as a starting point to identify organisational characteristics of digital excellence in hospitals (box 4).…”

Synthesizing Dimensions of Digital Maturity in Hospitals: Systematic Review

“…Despite both the rapid global uptake of eHealth technologies [ 5 ] and digital health being viewed as a panacea [ 6 ] for achieving the “quadruple aim” of health care (ie, reducing costs, improving patient experience, improving the work life of health care providers, and advancing population health) [ 7 ], the outcomes of digital health transformation are inconclusive and mixed [ 8 , 9 ]. One proposed method for strategically developing a digital health agenda is to follow a roadmap informed by digital maturity assessments [ 10 , 11 ].…”

Information Technology Ambidexterity, Digital Dynamic Capability, and Knowledge Processes as Enablers of Patient Agility: Empirical Study

“…In addition, digital options and innovations provide ways for clinicians to be more agile in their work, improve clinical communication, remotely monitor patients, and improve clinical decision support [49][50][51][52], and hence improve the patient treatment process and quality of medical services [51,53]. Moreover, recent scholarship advocates the deployment of knowledge assets, processes, and digital-driven sense and responding capabilities as a way of achieving higher quality and patient-centered care and financial performance benefits in hospitals [46,54,55]. Moreover, Fadlalla and Wickramasinghe [56] argue that patient-centered (care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values) sensing, responding, and digital capabilities are crucial in facilitating high-quality care.…”