2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological lock-in in action: Appraisal and policy commitment in Argentina's seed sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is routinely claimed that Argentina, the world's third-largest producer of genetically engineered (GE) crops, saw a significant increase in crop productivity due to GE technology. However, our analysis suggests that this interpretation is misleading -and in fact, innovations based on conventional plant breeding have been at least as important as GE technology in explaining the growth in Argentinean soy production from 1995-2015 (Marín, Stubrin and van Zwanenberg 2023). Policy interventions based on the mistaken assessment of the impact of GE technology have resulted in companies specialising in conventional plant-breeding techniques being unfairly crowded out of the market.…”
Section: Linkages Between Technological Innovation and Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It is routinely claimed that Argentina, the world's third-largest producer of genetically engineered (GE) crops, saw a significant increase in crop productivity due to GE technology. However, our analysis suggests that this interpretation is misleading -and in fact, innovations based on conventional plant breeding have been at least as important as GE technology in explaining the growth in Argentinean soy production from 1995-2015 (Marín, Stubrin and van Zwanenberg 2023). Policy interventions based on the mistaken assessment of the impact of GE technology have resulted in companies specialising in conventional plant-breeding techniques being unfairly crowded out of the market.…”
Section: Linkages Between Technological Innovation and Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 81%