Technological Momentum and the Hegemony of the Green Revolution: A Case Study of an Organic Rice Cooperative in Taiwan

Abstract

Increasing productivity through high-yield, high-response, chemicaldependent food crop cultivars to stabilize rural society-that was the Cold War -era social-technical strategy commonly known as the Green Revolution. A similar strategy was implemented in Taiwan in the 1950s as part of a rural reconstruction program sponsored by the United States. Aside from establishing a comprehensive web of social-technical institutions associated with modern agriculture, with the focus on the highly regulated rice sector, the program left a profound and multifaceted legacy in rural Taiwan, affecting social norms no less than it did the landscape. The authors of this article look at how the Green Revolution legacy affected an organic rice cooperative in Meinung, Taiwan. Decades of rural-urban migration have made agricultural machinery a necessity for most farmers. A tight relationship between machine service providers and the seedling production system confines farmers' choices of cultivars to those that are designed for modern cultivation, and these are not often well suited to organic methods. In addition, the comprehensive public technical-social support system that fostered the Green Revolution -style agriculture hardly exists for organic farmers in today's ethos of privatization. Those interwoven factors seriously hinder attempts to deviate from the modern agriculture's chemical-dependent path of agriculture.

Golden Snail Opera: The More-than-Human Performance of Friendly Farming on Taiwan’s Lanyang Plain

“…Alternative marketing networks are necessary. For alternative networks and rural revitalization in Taiwan, see Lo and Chen , J. Chen , Wo , and Tsai .…”

Sowing Seeds and Knowledge: Agricultural Development in Taiwan and the World, 1925–1975

“…Key studies have examined how the invention of Green Revolution cereal grain was closely tied with Cold War geopolitical objectives, especially those of the United States (Perkins 1997). Many of these studies have produced critiques of the Green Revolution and its methods, for instance, the dangerous reliance on chemical fertilizer inputs to reach advertised high yields of Green Revolution crop cultivars (Lo and Chen 2011). While my study builds upon the important works of these critiques of both development and the Green Revolution, methodologically it seeks to follow the footsteps of intellectual and scientific histories to shift our gaze beyond crop-cultivar-centered narratives toward the discourses, ideas, and processes of development.…”