1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02221051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological responses to risk in Holocene Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
120
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
120
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because assessments of relative curation are useful in testing models of changing mobility, land-use, economy, and technological organization, as well as in defining the relationships between tool design, labour investment and morphological standardization (for discussion of the value of the curation, tool design and use life concepts in addressing these questions see Ammerman & Feldman, 1974;Bamforth, 1986;Binford, 1979;Bleed, 1986;Close, 1991;Davis & Shea, 1998;Dibble, 1984Dibble, , 1995aDibble, , 1995bGordon, 1993;Hayden, Franco & Spafford, 1996;Hiscock, 1994Hiscock, , 1996Hiscock, , 1998Kelly, 1988;Kelly & Todd, 1988;Parry & Kelly, 1987;Holdaway, McPherron & Roth, 1996;Kuhn, 1990Kuhn, , 1992Kuhn, , 1995Nash, 1996;Neeley & Barton, 1994;Nelson, 1991;Odell, 1996;Shott, 1989Shott, , 1996Roland & Dibble, 1990;Torrence, 1983Torrence, , 1989.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because assessments of relative curation are useful in testing models of changing mobility, land-use, economy, and technological organization, as well as in defining the relationships between tool design, labour investment and morphological standardization (for discussion of the value of the curation, tool design and use life concepts in addressing these questions see Ammerman & Feldman, 1974;Bamforth, 1986;Binford, 1979;Bleed, 1986;Close, 1991;Davis & Shea, 1998;Dibble, 1984Dibble, , 1995aDibble, , 1995bGordon, 1993;Hayden, Franco & Spafford, 1996;Hiscock, 1994Hiscock, , 1996Hiscock, , 1998Kelly, 1988;Kelly & Todd, 1988;Parry & Kelly, 1987;Holdaway, McPherron & Roth, 1996;Kuhn, 1990Kuhn, , 1992Kuhn, , 1995Nash, 1996;Neeley & Barton, 1994;Nelson, 1991;Odell, 1996;Shott, 1989Shott, , 1996Roland & Dibble, 1990;Torrence, 1983Torrence, , 1989.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seemingly intentional optimisation and efficiency of blade blank consumption patterns lends support to this hypothesis. Additional confirmation of this hypothesis is provided by existing studies that identify backed blades as efficient, reliable and maintainable (Clarkson et al in press;Hiscock 1994;Hiscock et al 2011;Neeley 2002), as well as the subsequent chapter (Muller and Clarkson 2016a) which found small blades like those at Boncuklu to be remarkably efficient. In terms of this paper's broader archaeological utility, this new reduction intensity metric could be applied to any blade-based backed artefact tradition, including those appearing at various times from the Middle Stone Age to the Neolithic in Europe, the Near East, Africa, South Asia, and parts of Australia.…”
Section: Research Question 1: Archaeological Applications Of Experimementioning
confidence: 63%
“…The near complete utilisation of suitable blanks is not the only aspect of the microlith knapping schema that contributed to raw material conservation, with microliths being identified as inherently efficient. For example, they are viewed as durable, reliable and maintainable components of an efficient and portable toolkit that offset the risk from environmentally, demographically, economically or socially driven stress (Clarkson et al in press;Hiscock 1994;Hiscock et al 2011;Neeley 2002). Microliths are also made on very small blades, or bladelets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Smith 2003) have identified a broad suite of raw materials in Holocene sites in the Moreton Region, and the definition of "high quality" is subjective; the putative changes from exotic to local raw materials (e.g. sourced from Point Lookout on the island), and changes in technology may be responses to reduced risk in the availability and exploitation of resources (Hiscock 1994 and terrestrial resources (pademelon, Thylogale sp., and carpet python, Morelia spilota) to an exclusively marine economy based around fish and molluscs. Neal and Stock (1986:621) concluded that the site must have been a "a marginal environment throughout the Pleistocene and Holocene, and the limited extent of the archaeological remains suggest that this location was a temporary transit camp located on an access route between major resource zones located on the coast to the east and the river valley and mountains to the west" (although see Chapter 9 discussion of long-term models of occupation).…”
Section: Establishing Chronologies and Site Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%