DOI: 10.14264/uql.2016.865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technologies of choice: The shaping of choice on the World Wide Web

Abstract: Nowadays, choice is a ubiquitous aspect of everyday life. The emergence of the web has contributed to this explosion of choice, providing a seemingly endless landscape of goods and services to choose from. Whilst choice is held to be fundamental to individual freedom, wellbeing and self-identity, we currently have little understanding about how websites shape or govern choice, and what this might mean for individuals and society. This thesis undertakes a foundational examination of how choice is shaped in onli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(201 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foucault’s concept of technologies of power offers a critical lens through which to examine the Futures Triangle and the complex dynamics at play within the process of mapping the future. By understanding the futures triangle as a technology of power, we acknowledge the mediating influence it has on surfacing the underlying power structures, dominant narratives, and social norms that shape society and our visions of the future (Foucault 1982; Graham 2014).…”
Section: Final Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foucault’s concept of technologies of power offers a critical lens through which to examine the Futures Triangle and the complex dynamics at play within the process of mapping the future. By understanding the futures triangle as a technology of power, we acknowledge the mediating influence it has on surfacing the underlying power structures, dominant narratives, and social norms that shape society and our visions of the future (Foucault 1982; Graham 2014).…”
Section: Final Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platforms such as Booking.com, Expedia and Trip Advisor use online communities and websites to promote their services and to support informed choice by involving suppliers and consumers of services. This trend is also observable in public service provision where public agencies, public-private partnerships (PPPs) and private companies provide sometimes competing (Karpik, 2010) technological support for choice, including comparisons, ratings and other user-generated content (Gobby, 2016;Graham, 2016;Wilkins, 2012). The introduction of often web-based technologies can be viewed as a translation process (Callon, 1986) in which material devices and activities are central actors in the construction of markets for public services ( Johansson Krafve, 2015;Zuiderent-Jerak and van Egmond, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such websites thus obtain a 'logic of choice' (in some ways akin to Ziewitz's (2012) 'logic of evaluation'). Moreover, the empirical analysis of websites undertaken by Graham (2016) revealed an interesting type or sub-species of choiceinfused websites, that is, large-scale platforms that go beyond the baseline or 'normal' understanding and experience of choice. Graham argues that the design features and architecture of platforms such as Amazon significantly expand the scope, scale and speed of choice-making, blur the line between users and content producers (Bruns and Schmidt, 2011), and embody a form of empiricism that radically challenges how we come to know and differentiate choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on theories in the sociology of classification and standards and science and technology studies (STS), I argue that this novel form of empiricism radically challenges, and perhaps even nullifies, existing categories and standards that used to define choice. In 'Choice and the politics of commensuration within produsage-driven platforms' section I use illustrative case examples of popular choice-infused platforms (Graham, 2016) to discuss how their design features and architecture shape choice in a way that breaks down, hybridises, and challenges the longstanding conceptual dualisms that we use to understand consumer choice and web use, such as producers versus consumers, and users versus producers. In the final section I examine how the individuality, self-governing capacities and subjectivity of users is actively harnessed and attempted to be shaped by platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%