2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology Acceptance Model: Extension to Sport Consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TAM has been applied in various areas of technology adoption. In sport research, TAM has been used as a framework to investigate the adoption of sports brand apps (Byun et al, 2018) and the use of sports websites (Ahn et al, 2014; Hur et al, 2012; Ibrahim, 2014) for varying informational, recreational, and purchase purposes. Particularly, Hur et al (2012) offer a sport contextualisation to TAM by developing the sports website acceptance model (SWAM).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TAM has been applied in various areas of technology adoption. In sport research, TAM has been used as a framework to investigate the adoption of sports brand apps (Byun et al, 2018) and the use of sports websites (Ahn et al, 2014; Hur et al, 2012; Ibrahim, 2014) for varying informational, recreational, and purchase purposes. Particularly, Hur et al (2012) offer a sport contextualisation to TAM by developing the sports website acceptance model (SWAM).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, empirical research focused on consumer behavior at the intersection of sport content and media technology acceptance and use is still limited (e.g. Ibrahim, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://www.actacommercii.co.za Open Access Ibrahim 2014;Park & Kim 2014;Wallace & Sheetz 2014) and can be used in the statistical analyses of future business tourism events-related studies. Ayeh (2015) and Kim et al (2008aKim et al ( , 2008b highlight the importance of user attitude in technology acceptance.…”
Section: Limitations and Avenues For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%