2018
DOI: 10.37134/ibej.vol11.1.2.2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology Acceptance of a Novel Mobile Learning Application among University Undergraduates

Abstract: This paper identifies factors affecting the adoption of mobile learning application in the classroom. The principles of the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) were adopted as the main elements that were investigated in this study, namely relative advantage, complexity, mobile learning acceptance, and intention to use mobile learning. The research design was based on a quantitative approach using an online survey involving a group of 200 undergraduates. Data collected were a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study was examined by using three technology acceptance constructs, which were a relative advantage, mobile learning acceptance and intention to use mobile learning. Hanafi et al (2018) found that the respondents agree in utilizing mobile learning approach and it will give a high impact on the current teaching and learning process in the campus. According to Al-Shibi et al ( 2018) technology has improved the students' skill and their learning patterns.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study was examined by using three technology acceptance constructs, which were a relative advantage, mobile learning acceptance and intention to use mobile learning. Hanafi et al (2018) found that the respondents agree in utilizing mobile learning approach and it will give a high impact on the current teaching and learning process in the campus. According to Al-Shibi et al ( 2018) technology has improved the students' skill and their learning patterns.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Result found that students agreed that the game was an effective teaching method for developing pervasive skills (Viviers et al, 2016). Hanafi et al (2018) conducted a study to identify factors affecting the adoption of mobile application in the classroom. The study was examined by using three technology acceptance constructs, which were a relative advantage, mobile learning acceptance and intention to use mobile learning.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence signaled that notwithstanding the direct impact of mobile technology on effective learning ways and processes, university students’ intention to use certain mobile technological products can be influenced by technology infrastructure ( Kim et al, 2017 ), users’ satisfaction ( Du, 2015 ), instructional support for mobile learning ( Safford and Stinton, 2016 ), and users’ technology literacy ( George and DeCristofaro, 2016 ). Insofar as the reliance on mobile technology grows for preparing students for the twenty-first century workplace, identifying motivators and hinders related to learners’ acceptance of mobile technology have been at the foci of vibrant and proliferating streams of research across cultures and disciplines (e.g., Chang et al, 2017 ; Hanafi et al, 2018 ; Saroia and Gao, 2019 ; Hoi, 2020 ). As Teo and Zhou (2014) pointed out, it remains an important issue to understand how learners accept and use a technological product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%