2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology adoption and risk exposure among smallholder farmers: Panel data evidence from Tanzania and Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hardaker et al ( 2015 ) indeed affirm that risk-averse people may be willing to forgo some expected output for a reduction in risk, the rate of acceptable trade-off depending on how risk-averse that person is. Mukasa ( 2018 ) considering four moments of production (mean, variance, skewness and kurtosis) and the probability of adopting several modern inputs (including, improved seeds, chemical fertilizer and pesticides) revealed that most modern inputs are risk reducing though sometimes at great cost to farmers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardaker et al ( 2015 ) indeed affirm that risk-averse people may be willing to forgo some expected output for a reduction in risk, the rate of acceptable trade-off depending on how risk-averse that person is. Mukasa ( 2018 ) considering four moments of production (mean, variance, skewness and kurtosis) and the probability of adopting several modern inputs (including, improved seeds, chemical fertilizer and pesticides) revealed that most modern inputs are risk reducing though sometimes at great cost to farmers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that they may regard technology as a way to overcome challenges and improve their yields, we suggest that they will be more likely to adopt it. Furthermore, farmers are known to be often risk-averse, and as such reluctant to adopt new technologies ( Mukasa, 2018 ). Creativity may buffer their reluctance, making them more flexible, open to new experiences, and tolerant of ambiguity.…”
Section: T Heoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 74 studies, 25 included some quantitative assessment of the frequency of pesticide use. Notably, the five studies that use national-level data from the Uganda National Panel Survey or the World Bank's data set LSMS-ISA (Ali et al, 2016;de la O Campos et al, 2016;Mukasa, 2018; consistently report much lower figures than studies that build on the researchers' own surveys, despite the fact that most such surveys focus on one type of pesticide and/or crop. One possible explanation is that some researchers interested in pesticides purposively select settings where they expect to find it, and indeed, pesticide use varies considerably with locality, cropping system, and production orientation.…”
Section: Poor Monitoring Of Pesticide Use and Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%