2017
DOI: 10.1097/hrp.0000000000000148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology-Based Interventions for Substance Use and Comorbid Disorders: An Examination of the Emerging Literature

Abstract: Among individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs), comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders is common and often noted as the rule rather than the exception. Standard care providing integrated treatment for comorbid diagnoses simultaneously has been shown to be effective. Technology-based interventions (TBIs) have the potential to provide a cost-effective platform for and greater accessibility to integrated treatments. For the purposes of this review, we defined TBIs as interventions in which the primar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abstract screening occurred by 2 raters in Abstrackr (Wallace et al., ). Finally, a bibliographic search of eligible studies and literature reviews was completed (Carroll and Kiluk, ; Moore et al., ; Riper et al., ; Rooke et al., ; Sugarman et al., ). Figure provides a visual representation of study inclusion, and although all drug use disorders were initially of interest, the majority of studies addressed alcohol use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abstract screening occurred by 2 raters in Abstrackr (Wallace et al., ). Finally, a bibliographic search of eligible studies and literature reviews was completed (Carroll and Kiluk, ; Moore et al., ; Riper et al., ; Rooke et al., ; Sugarman et al., ). Figure provides a visual representation of study inclusion, and although all drug use disorders were initially of interest, the majority of studies addressed alcohol use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, a meta‐analysis on the efficacy of technology‐delivered CBT for alcohol use has not been conducted. There are reviews of technology‐delivered interventions for alcohol as well as other drug use (Bickel et al., ; Moore et al., ; Rooke et al., ; Sugarman et al., ; Tait et al., ), but none of these reviews have evaluated the evidence of CBT or CBT‐based interventions, specifically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, researchers studying ROOT and TBI in longitudinal work may wish to assess unhealthy use of the internet and social media over time (e.g., Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale; Andreassen, Pallesen, & Griffiths, 2017). With greater work in this area, potential risks may be considered alongside benefits offered by well-designed, theoretically-grounded interventions and services that leverage online technology platforms (Fowler et al, 2016; Litvin et al, 2013; Marsch, 2012; Sugarman et al, 2017). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews suggest TBIs are generally better than inactive comparison conditions (e.g., self-help reading materials; Fowler et al, 2016; Litvin, Abrantes, & Brown, 2013). They may do as well as clinician-led approaches both for individuals with SUD (Fowler et al, 2016; Litvin et al, 2013), and co-occurring substance use and mental health problems (Sugarman, Campbell, Iles, & Greenfield, 2017). In clinical settings, TBIs that are added to, or substituted for parts of, usual treatment may yield the best outcomes (Carroll et al, 2008; Gustafson et al, 2014; Marsch et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, among AC patients in the United Kingdom, women were less likely to have alcohol use recorded and were overall less likely to interact with the healthcare system in the period prior to their AC diagnosis (Otete et al, 2015). Despite evidence that women are less likely to seek face-to-face treatment, when women do access psychosocial treatment, they may have better treatment outcomes than men (Green et al, 2009;Sugarman et al, 2017). Low treatment utilization among women is particularly concerning given a higher proportion of American women now meet criteria for AUD than ever before, with rates rising more rapidly in women than in men (Grant et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%