1993
DOI: 10.1016/0024-6301(93)90314-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology fusion and the new R & D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
123
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The successful recombining of existing knowledge in novel ways through networks (Nelson and Winter 1982) involving knowledge 'collisions' and 'transpositions' (Powell and Grodal 2005) is an example of the effective miscibility of knowledge. Similarly, combining different fields of knowledge creation, such as technology fusion (Kodama 1992), represents effective knowledge miscibility (Cantwell 2005). Network capital investments, however, may become ineffective if there is knowledge equivalence between organizations due to similarities in knowledge profiles, which results in network redundancy (Cowan et al 2004).…”
Section: Knowledge Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful recombining of existing knowledge in novel ways through networks (Nelson and Winter 1982) involving knowledge 'collisions' and 'transpositions' (Powell and Grodal 2005) is an example of the effective miscibility of knowledge. Similarly, combining different fields of knowledge creation, such as technology fusion (Kodama 1992), represents effective knowledge miscibility (Cantwell 2005). Network capital investments, however, may become ineffective if there is knowledge equivalence between organizations due to similarities in knowledge profiles, which results in network redundancy (Cowan et al 2004).…”
Section: Knowledge Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As earlier discussed, 4 An influential Harvard Business Review article by Kodama (1992) heralded the merits of the then-distinctively Japanese practice of placing cooperative innovation under protective organizational umbrellas: most notably the well-known MITI-led consortia, but trade associations and keiretsu groupings as well (Rtischev and Cole, 2003;Schaede, 2006). He singled out for particular praise the Sumitomo (horizontal) group alliance in semiconductors.…”
Section: H3b: the Keiretsu Negative Homophily Effects Are Larger Whenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, combining different fields of knowledge creation, such as technology fusion (Kodama, 1992), represents effective knowledge miscibility (Cantwell, 2005). According to Quatraro (2010), knowledge is the outcome of a combinatorial search activity carried out across a technological space in which combinable elements reside.…”
Section: The Nature Of Accessed Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%