2015
DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology, Humanness, and Trust: Rethinking Trust in Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
328
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
328
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The third level of trust is moral trust, where trust between the interactants is based on a shared sense of rights and obligations, rooted in a principled sense of what is right and wrong, that can override strategic concerns. In human-human interactions, this corresponds to a belief that the person being trusted is benevolent [11]. This trust is based on shared values, i.e.…”
Section: Levels Of Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third level of trust is moral trust, where trust between the interactants is based on a shared sense of rights and obligations, rooted in a principled sense of what is right and wrong, that can override strategic concerns. In human-human interactions, this corresponds to a belief that the person being trusted is benevolent [11]. This trust is based on shared values, i.e.…”
Section: Levels Of Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affordances are bestowed upon artefacts—they are the qualities that users perceive objects, places, contexts, and constructs uphold and encompass (Beynon‐Davies & Lederman, ; Choy & Schlagwein, ; Ciavola & Gershenson, ; Faraj, Jarvenpaa, & Majchrzak, ; Gaver, ; Lankton, McKnight, & Tripp, ; Maier & Fadel, ; Majchrzak & Markus, ; Withagen & Chemero, ; Xenakis & Arnellos, ; Zammuto, Griffith, Majchrak, Dougherty, & Faraj, ). Affordances are bound to expectations of what artefacts can be/can do and thus reputational information (Kewell, ) that tells us whether the actions they ought to assist (Ciavola & Gershenson, , p. 252) or facilitate are worthwhile, valuable, risky, or unwise (Zammuto et al, ).…”
Section: Affordancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we believe that human today highly trust technology and several examples are available in our daily life. For instance, [11] highlighted that people usually trust word processing applications to save their documents as well as sharing images and personal information with others over the internet. Therefore, researchers are investigating the factors affecting the trust of technology and how trust would affect the usage of technology.…”
Section: A Technology and Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that trust is significantly affected by performance, usefulness, ease of use, satisfaction and disconfirmation. Moreover, technology trust can be classified into two different forms particularly humanlike trust and system-like trust [11]. However, it is not straight forward to decide which form to use and which factors to adopt.…”
Section: A Technology and Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%