1993
DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250140206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology's varying impact on the success of strategic business units within the miles and snow typology

Abstract: The high-tech industry is usually treated as an homogeneous entity, without differentiating between organizations according to the relative importance of technology in their business strategy. This paper investigates the varying impact of technology on the success of strategic birsiness units within the Miles and Snow typology. Although common wisdom might lead to the conclusion that prospectors are more dependent on technological progress than the other strategic types, the results show rather that the influe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0
11

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
83
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The firms in Group 1 rely more on organizational resources than firms in Group 2, especially information and employee management systems, which are prerequisite to support coordination and promote entrepreneurship (Miles and Snow 1984). They rely even more on technological resources, precursors of innovation (Dvir et al 1993). Coherently with the above mentioned results, the firms in Group 1 put higher emphasis than firms in Group 2 on human resource management activities and on infrastructure-aimed at the overall coordination-and technology development activities-which are crucial since firms in Group 1 are active in relatively less mature industries and therefore with higher innovation potential.…”
Section: Strategy and Knowledge Management Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The firms in Group 1 rely more on organizational resources than firms in Group 2, especially information and employee management systems, which are prerequisite to support coordination and promote entrepreneurship (Miles and Snow 1984). They rely even more on technological resources, precursors of innovation (Dvir et al 1993). Coherently with the above mentioned results, the firms in Group 1 put higher emphasis than firms in Group 2 on human resource management activities and on infrastructure-aimed at the overall coordination-and technology development activities-which are crucial since firms in Group 1 are active in relatively less mature industries and therefore with higher innovation potential.…”
Section: Strategy and Knowledge Management Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Firms with a strategic proactivity capability develop processes and routines to recognize ideas in order to actively seize and capitalize on new opportunities rather than merely react to change. This involves the early identifi cation of new opportunities for technological leadership (Dvir, Segev, & Shenhar, 1993), the facilitation of speedy response, and the adoption of organizational structures and processes that reduce uncertainty in managing strategic issues (Veliyath & Shortell, 1993).…”
Section: Strategic Proactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El argumento que sustenta esta afirmación es el gran número de trabajos científicos (Zahra y Pearce II, 1990;Dvir, Segev y Shenhar, 1993;Hambrick, 1982;Hambrick, 1983c;Conan, Mokwa y Varadarajan, 1990;Shortell y Zajac, 1990;Segev y Weber, 1991;Beekum y Ginn, 1993;Veliyath y Shortell, 1993;Aragón, 1996;y Sánchez, Zerón y Mendoza, 2014) que como puede comprobarse basan, en mayor o menor grado, su desarrollo en dicha propuesta de la clasificación de la estrategia empresarial.…”
Section:  Directivas De Milles Y Snow (1978)unclassified