Technopolis, shared resources or controlled mobility? A net-based Delphi-study to explore visions of future urban daily mobility in Norway

Julsrud, Tom Erik; Uteng, Tanu Priya

doi:10.1007/s40309-015-0069-6

Cited by 31 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the one hand, Delphi, similarly as scenarios, is set into everyday routines and undertakes issues related to the local government, policy, market [112], and customer preferences [117]. Furthermore, Delphi sets its actions in the long-distance futures of the year (e.g., 2050 [118]) and endeavors the most probable [117,119] desirable [117], and preferable futures [120]. Despite some limitations, [113] claim that Delphi creates futures, rather than predict them; therefore, this is the valuable method when dealing with intense and uncertain changes over an extended period.…”

Section: Landscape Overview Of Indiviual Groups Of Methods and Their mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Landscape of Envisioning and Speculative Design Methods for Sustainable Mobility Futures

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban mobility is facing an increased long-term uncertainty and complexity generated by accelerated technological development. These challenges require radical advancement in planning processes and methods, which could enable breaking out of path dependencies and unlocking alternative, sustainable futures. In order to provide a landscape overview of foresight-focused methods used in the domain of urban mobility, we conduct a systematic literature review. An analytical framework for review is based on planning knowledge taxonomy, including dialectic between knowing how/what and knowing to what end and doing. Such framework formulation is aiming to assess methodological capacity for widening system boundary and holism (object-focus) as well as integration and imagination (process-focus). Results show that the overall trend of methodological development is emphasizing development in object or process-focus domain, but rarely both. In addition to this assessment, we conclude that methodological development should further reflect the moral and democratic dimension concerning public deliberation. Such development should aim to create spaces for shared discussion, reflection, and formation of alternative futures, while allowing spaces for agonistic contestation and conflicting opinions through radical, experimental, and experiential approaches.

show abstract

Section: Landscape Overview Of Indiviual Groups Of Methods and Their mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Landscape of Envisioning and Speculative Design Methods for Sustainable Mobility Futures

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The business stakeholders, shippers, and freight operators had the same priorities [68], which were mainly focused on the economic dimension [77,85]. Nevertheless, it should be noted that still, stakeholder analysis in areas of crowdsourcing, urban development, urban logistics, mobility, and CL should be improved, and more empirical studies are needed to address the problem of their needs and characteristics [86][87][88].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach

Rześny-Cieplińska

Szmelter-Jarosz

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents the assessment results for crowd logistics (CL) solutions from the perspective of the needs of different stakeholders. The uniqueness of this study lies in entering these needs in the implementation of the three spheres of sustainable development in cities (social, economic, and environmental). The purpose of this publication is to present the benchmark solutions for the CL area, helping to adjust the business model and market offer of other providers to the needs of different groups of stakeholders. The reason for such valuation is the fast-paced sharing economy development in the city logistics area, as well as in the courier activity. For this study, the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method was applied in order to develop the proposed evaluation tool of the CL initiatives. The evaluation criteria (the needs of particular groups of respondents) are derived from document-based data analysis and the primary data for the model are derived from information provided by service providers. The list of the best solutions is made for indicating benchmark brands on the market. The recommendations for managers were drawn on how to adjust solutions to the stakeholders’ needs.

show abstract

“…Because the primary methods in the identified literature were interviews and surveys on stakeholders' needs, the hybrid approach was chosen (Delphi method and interview) to address the requirements of the reliable research results and valuable insights. Multiple researchers have used the Delphi method in their research in the city logistics field, exploring future mobility [97], multi-stakeholder scenarios for its development [39,40], and societal trends on urban public transport, to name a few [98]. Therefore, it was recognized as the proper method for this study.…”

Section: Interview and Delphi Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental Sustainability in City Logistics Measures

Rześny-Cieplińska

Szmelter-Jarosz

2020

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable urban transport is fundamental not only for economic growth but also for the environmental protection, thus all logistics activities within the cities should be organized in a way to be environmentally friendly. The article aims at presenting the environmental sustainability of city logistics measures from different stakeholder perspectives. In the paper, a multi-method approach was implemented: literature review, text analysis, text mining, and statistical analysis. The paper presents how the stakeholders perceive urban logistics, if they see the need for coordination of its elements, who should be responsible for it, and what areas are the most important for them. The main task of this study is to recognize the priorities of different stakeholders. In consequence, the final effect of this article is an insight that is valuable not only for the local authorities but for many stakeholders, groups operating within the city that are and in many cases cooperating within the framework of creating sustainable urban mobility plans.

show abstract

Technopolis, shared resources or controlled mobility? A net-based Delphi-study to explore visions of future urban daily mobility in Norway

Cited by 31 publications

References 27 publications

The Landscape of Envisioning and Speculative Design Methods for Sustainable Mobility Futures

The Landscape of Envisioning and Speculative Design Methods for Sustainable Mobility Futures

Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach

Environmental Sustainability in City Logistics Measures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About