1993
DOI: 10.1144/0040791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic and stratigraphic aspects of the East Irish Sea Basin and adjacent areas: contrasts in their post-Carboniferous structural styles

Abstract: A revised geological map and lithostratigraphic correlation chart are presented for Carboniferous–Lower Jurassic strata in the East Irish Sea Basin (EISB) and contiguous basins of the NW–SE- to NNW–SSE-trending Clyde Belt. The significance of the exceptionally thick Triassic succession (4375 m) is documented in relation to other Triassic rifts of NW Europe. Basin margin faults within the Clyde Belt are basement-controlled and located either along the margins of exposed and concealed Ordovician–early Devonian b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basinward extrapolation of these sequences implies that they are likely to be the lateral equivalents of intervals in the base of the Mercia Mudstone Group. These are probably the dolomite-and halite-dominated intervals that, as noted by Jackson and Mulholland (1993), pinch out progressively southwards with stratigraphically higher halites overstepping those below such that only the youngest of the Anisian halites (the Preesall Halite) in the East Irish Sea Basin (Figure 1) has an equivalent in the Cheshire Basin (the Northwich Halite). Well and borehole data in the area, as described by Jackson and Mulholland (1993), make it clear that the halites have not been post-depositionally eroded but rather were non-depositional beyond their mapped limits.…”
Section: Revised Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Basinward extrapolation of these sequences implies that they are likely to be the lateral equivalents of intervals in the base of the Mercia Mudstone Group. These are probably the dolomite-and halite-dominated intervals that, as noted by Jackson and Mulholland (1993), pinch out progressively southwards with stratigraphically higher halites overstepping those below such that only the youngest of the Anisian halites (the Preesall Halite) in the East Irish Sea Basin (Figure 1) has an equivalent in the Cheshire Basin (the Northwich Halite). Well and borehole data in the area, as described by Jackson and Mulholland (1993), make it clear that the halites have not been post-depositionally eroded but rather were non-depositional beyond their mapped limits.…”
Section: Revised Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These are probably the dolomite-and halite-dominated intervals that, as noted by Jackson and Mulholland (1993), pinch out progressively southwards with stratigraphically higher halites overstepping those below such that only the youngest of the Anisian halites (the Preesall Halite) in the East Irish Sea Basin (Figure 1) has an equivalent in the Cheshire Basin (the Northwich Halite). Well and borehole data in the area, as described by Jackson and Mulholland (1993), make it clear that the halites have not been post-depositionally eroded but rather were non-depositional beyond their mapped limits. As the halites have marine isotopic affinities (Naylor et al 1989) it therefore seems reasonable to infer that the halites mark the limits of successive marine transgressions, each reaching progressively further south and east through the southern parts of the East Irish Sea Basin and ultimately the Cheshire Basin.…”
Section: Revised Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This kind of analysis is only applicable to remnant stratigraphy however, and cannot yield any information on rifting beyond the age of the youngest preserved stratigraphy [Rowley and White, 1998]. Jackson and Mulholland's [1993] fault displacement analyses of major synsedimentary normal faults in the EISB suggested that 64-76% of extension was concentrated within the Late Permian-Triassic period, and displacement rates were highest during Lower-Middle Triassic SSG deposition. Ruffell and Shelton [1999] argued, on the basis of seismic stratigraphic analyses of growth faulting, that a larger proportion of faultcontrolled, synsedimentary movement occurred during the Middle-Late Triassic deposition of the MMG, rather than the Early Triassic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent work in this basin however, aided by both a substantially enlarged dataset and methodological advances, has demonstrated the importance of advective fluid-related heating and periods of elevated basal heat flow, implying that the elevated palaeotemperatures recorded by AFTA cannot be interpreted in terms of heating due solely to deeper burial (Green et al 1997;Green 2002;Holford et al 2005a). Since the youngest pre-Quaternary sediments in the EISB are Lower Jurassic in age (Jackson & Mulholland 1993) minimal stratigraphic constraints can be placed upon the timing and magnitude of late Mesozoic-Cenozoic exhumation; the top Mesozoic unconformity in this basin is in all likelihood a composite feature which records at least three separate pulses of uplift and erosion (Holford 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%