2018
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-2018-9
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic controls of Holocene erosion in a glaciated orogen

Abstract: Abstract. Recent work has highlighted a strong, worldwide, glacial impact of orogen erosion rates over the last 2 Ma. While it may be assumed that glaciers increased erosion rates when active, the degree to which past glaciations influence Holocene erosion rates through the adjustment of topography is not known. In this study, we investigate the influence of long-term tectonic and post-glacial topographic controls on erosion in a glaciated orogen, the Olympic Mountains, USA. We present 14 10 new 10 Be and 26 A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the signal indicative of recent acceleration of erosion/exhumation rate in the western GC comes from bedrock samples taken from areas glaciated during the LGM. In such regions, (a) fluvial landscape form could be obscured or modified by glacial activity (e.g., Anderson et al., 2006; Brocklehurst & Whipple, 2002) and thus the extrapolation of millennial erosion rates from k sn could be problematic and (b) glacial erosion itself could contribute to increased rates of rock uplift (e.g., Hallet et al., 1996), though the extent to which glaciers can perturb long‐term exhumation rates remains controversial (e.g., Adams & Ehlers, 2018; Michel et al., 2018). However, the observed patterns largely persist if formerly glaciated sample sites are removed from consideration, though the fidelity of the patterns are reduced (Figure 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the signal indicative of recent acceleration of erosion/exhumation rate in the western GC comes from bedrock samples taken from areas glaciated during the LGM. In such regions, (a) fluvial landscape form could be obscured or modified by glacial activity (e.g., Anderson et al., 2006; Brocklehurst & Whipple, 2002) and thus the extrapolation of millennial erosion rates from k sn could be problematic and (b) glacial erosion itself could contribute to increased rates of rock uplift (e.g., Hallet et al., 1996), though the extent to which glaciers can perturb long‐term exhumation rates remains controversial (e.g., Adams & Ehlers, 2018; Michel et al., 2018). However, the observed patterns largely persist if formerly glaciated sample sites are removed from consideration, though the fidelity of the patterns are reduced (Figure 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulk velocities are the result of solving the quasi-steady-state force balance equations for nearly incompressible fluids with a finite-element approach on an octree mesh. Pressure values are derived indirectly from the velocity solution by the penalty method (e.g., Bathe, 1982), and local smoothing is applied to avoid smallscale pressure oscillations. Finally, temperature is computed, incorporating the effects of material velocities and thermal properties.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where µ is the material shear viscosity, V the velocity field, P the pressure, is the density, and g the gravity acceleration. The solution is computed with the finite-element method using Q1P0 elements; i.e., the pressure is calculated from the velocity field by the penalty formulation (e.g., Bathe, 1982):…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%