“…The mineral zircon has been most commonly analysed to constrain important source to sink relationships due to its (a) crustal abundance, (b) physical and chemical robustness, (c) incorporation of U but exclusion of Pb during crystallization (excellent geochronometer), (d) preservation of Hf‐ and O‐isotope characteristics (ability to resolve crustal evolution and the degree of mantle input/crustal re‐working), and (e) capturing of distinctive trace elements into the crystal structure (Belousova, Griffin, O'Reilly, & Fisher, ; Fedo et al, ; Grimes et al, ; Grimes, Wooden, Cheadle, & John, ; Hawkesworth & Kemp, ; Roberts & Spencer, ). Given that the geochronological, geochemical and even grain morphological characteristics of zircon minerals from crystalline source regions are becoming well established in southern Australia, refined sediment tracking of primary and recycled components, as well as basin correlations, are becoming increasingly possible (Barham, Kirkland, & Danišík, ; Barham et al, , ; Cawood & Nemchin, ; Cawood, Nemchin, Freeman, & Sircombe, ; Haines, Wingate, & Kirkland, ; Lloyd et al, ; MacDonald et al, ; Makulini, Kirkland, & Barham, ; Olierook et al, ; Sircombe & Freeman, ; Veevers, Belousova, & Saeed, ; Veevers, Saeed, Belousova, & Griffin, ). Although the geology of East Antarctica is largely inaccessible due to ice‐cover, extended Australia‐Antarctica connection prior to rifting means many of the major Australian crystalline basement elements are shared with the pre‐rifted adjacent Antarctic margin (Aitken et al, ; Barham, Kirkland, & Hollis, ; Fitzsimons, ; Morrissey, Hand, & Kelsey, ; Morrissey, Payne et al, ).…”