Dyke Swarms:Keys for Geodynamic Interpretation 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12496-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic Significance and Age of Doleritic Sill Near Bandhalimal in the Singhora Protobasin of Chhattisgarh Basin, Central India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pollard, 1987;Marinoni, 2001and references therein;Sinha et al, 2011) and they are often interpreted as paleostress markers (Purucker and Whaler, 2015 Accordingly, the emplacement of a majority of the NE-SW trending magmatic rock bodies inferred in the present study is likely to have occurred within a NW-SE regional minimum compressive stress field, possibly in the Hauterivian/Barremian -Aptian. That a similar stress field is implied by the dominant trends associated with the magmatic Alpha Ridge suggests that the majority of the magmatic rocks in the present study area may be related to the Alpha Ridge magmatism.…”
Section: Tectonic Implications Of Magmatic Intrusion Trendsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pollard, 1987;Marinoni, 2001and references therein;Sinha et al, 2011) and they are often interpreted as paleostress markers (Purucker and Whaler, 2015 Accordingly, the emplacement of a majority of the NE-SW trending magmatic rock bodies inferred in the present study is likely to have occurred within a NW-SE regional minimum compressive stress field, possibly in the Hauterivian/Barremian -Aptian. That a similar stress field is implied by the dominant trends associated with the magmatic Alpha Ridge suggests that the majority of the magmatic rocks in the present study area may be related to the Alpha Ridge magmatism.…”
Section: Tectonic Implications Of Magmatic Intrusion Trendsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although the Bastar Craton is affected by four distinct compositional suites of magma (Srivastava & Gautam 2009;Sinha et al 2011), the overlying Chhattisgarh succession is affected by only one variety -tholeiite with basalt to basaltic andesite affinity. shows an analogous pattern, with both enriched in large ion lithophile elements (LILE) compared with high field strength elements (HFSE).…”
Section: Igneous Inputs Within the Chhattisgarh Successionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mafic intrusives of different ages and compositions are extensively reported from the southern, central and northern parts of the craton (e.g., Ramachandra et al 1995;Subba Rao et al 2004, 2008aSrivastava 2006;Mondal et al 2007;French et al 2008;Hussain et al 2008;Srivastava and Gautam 2008Ratre et al 2010;Das et al 2011;Srivastava et al 2011;Gautam and Srivastava 2011;Sinha et al 2011;Pisarevsky et al 2013). The intrusives include sub-alkaline mafic dykes i.e., Bastar Dykes 1 (BD1 of ∼2.7 Ga) and Bastar Dykes 2 (BD2 of 1.88-1.89 Ga), boninitenorite dykes (∼2.1 Ga) from the southern part (French et al 2008;Srivastava 2008;Srivastava et al 2011), Bhanupratappur-Keshkal dykes from the central part (Ramachandra et al 1995;Gautam and Srivastava 2011;Srivastava and Gautam 2012) and Dongargarh, Chhura, Lakhna (∼1.44 Ga) and Bandimal (∼1.42 Ga) dykes from the northern part of the craton (Ratre et al 2010;Das et al 2011;Sinha et al 2011;Pisarevsky et al 2013;Srivastava and Gautam 2015).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%