Tectonic systems and the deposition of iron-formation

Gross, G A

doi:10.1016/0301-9268(83)90072-4

Cited by 92 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The consensus view is that the Brockman Iron Formation was deposited on a large, stable, and clastic-starved continental platform, which was only influenced by episodic inputs of fine-grained tuffaceous detritus (e.g., Ewers and Morris, 1981;Gross, 1983). Barley et al (1997) suggested that deposition of the Hamersley IFs was possibly linked to major submarine magmatic plume activity in the form of a large igneous province (LIP).…”

Section: The Largest Ifs By Mass Are Associated With the Brockman Iromentioning

confidence: 99%

Iron formations: A global record of Neoarchaean to Palaeoproterozoic environmental history

Konhauser

Planavsky

Hardisty

et al. 2017

Earth-Science Reviews

382

257

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Largest Ifs By Mass Are Associated With the Brockman Iromentioning

confidence: 99%

Iron formations: A global record of Neoarchaean to Palaeoproterozoic environmental history

Konhauser

Planavsky

Hardisty

et al. 2017

Earth-Science Reviews

382

257

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Iron formations are broadly categorized into two classes, one with close association to volcanic successions (Algoma-type), and one without (Superiortype) (Gross 1965;Gross 1983). The Algoma-type iron formations are distributed throughout the Archaean sedimentary record, whereas Superiortype deposits only become significant at 2.6 Ga and later (Huston & Logan 2004) (Fig.…”

Section: The Evolving Ocean and Atmospherementioning

confidence: 99%

Palaeoproterozoic supercontinents and global evolution: correlations from core to atmosphere

Reddy

Evans

2009

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Palaeoproterozoic era was a time of profound change in Earth evolution and represented perhaps the first supercontinent cycle, from the amalgamation and dispersal of a possible Neoarchaean supercontinent to the formation of the 1.9-1.8 Ga supercontinent Nuna. This supercontinent cycle, although currently lacking in palaeogeographic detail, can in principle provide a contextual framework to investigate the relationships between deep-Earth and surface processes. In this article, we graphically summarize secular evolution from the Earth's core to its atmosphere, from the Neoarchaean to the Mesoproterozoic eras (specifically 3.0-1.2 Ga), to reveal intriguing temporal relationships across the various 'spheres' of the Earth system. At the broadest level our compilation confirms an important deep-Earth event at c. 2.7 Ga that is manifested in an abrupt increase in geodynamo palaeointensity, a peak in the global record of large igneous provinces, and a broad maximum in several mantle-depletion proxies. Temporal coincidence with juvenile continental crust production and orogenic gold, massive-sulphide and porphyry copper deposits, indicate enhanced mantle convection linked to a series of mantle plumes and/or slab avalanches. The subsequent stabilization of cratonic lithosphere, the possible development of Earth's first supercontinent and the emergence of the continents led to a changing surface environment in which voluminous banded iron-formations could accumulate on the continental margins and photosynthetic life could flourish. This in turn led to irreversible atmospheric oxidation at 2.4-2.3 Ga, extreme events in global carbon cycling, and the possible dissipation of a former methane greenhouse atmosphere that resulted in extensive Palaeoproterozoic ice ages. Following the great oxidation event, shallow marine sulphate levels rose, sediment-hosted and iron-oxide-rich metal deposits became abundant, and the transition to sulphide-stratified oceans provided the environment for early eukaryotic evolution. Recent advances in the geochronology of the global stratigraphic record have made these inferences possible. Frontiers for future research include more refined modelling of Earth's thermal and geodynamic evolution, palaeomagnetic studies of geodynamo intensity and continental motions, further geochronology and tectonic syntheses at regional levels, development of new isotopic systems to constrain geochemical cycles, and continued innovation in the search for records of early life in relation to changing palaeoenvironments.

show abstract

“…Jarosite abundance increases with decreasing pH, whereas goethite is stable at pH 3.3-3.6 (Bigham & Nordstrom, 2000). The source of iron can be related to the sedimentary deposition of iron-rich formations along margins of cratons or continental platforms over extended periods of time (Gross, 1983). (Bigham & Nordstrom, 2000).…”

Section: International Journal Of Speleology 47 (3) 271-291 Tampamentioning

confidence: 99%

New insights on secondary minerals from Italian sulfuric acid caves

D’Angeli¹,

Carbone²,

Nagostinis³

et al. 2018

IJS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Sulfuric acid minerals are important clues to identify the speleogenetic phases of hypogene caves. Italy hosts ~25% of the known worldwide sulfuric acid speleogenetic (SAS) systems, including the famous well-studied Frasassi, Monte Cucco, and Acquasanta Terme caves. Nevertheless, other underground environments have been analyzed, and interesting mineralogical assemblages were found associated with peculiar geomorphological features such as cupolas, replacement pockets, feeders, sulfuric notches, and sub-horizontal levels.In this paper, we focused on 15 cave systems located along the Apennine Chain, in Apulia, in Sicily, and in Sardinia, where copious SAS minerals were observed. Some of the studied systems (e.g., Porretta Terme, Capo Palinuro, Cassano allo Ionio, Cerchiara di Calabria, Santa Cesarea Terme) are still active, and mainly used as spas for human treatments.The most interesting and diversified mineralogical associations have been documented in Monte Cucco (Umbria) and Cavallone-Bove (Abruzzo) caves, in which the common gypsum is associated with alunite-jarosite minerals, but also with baryte, celestine, fluorite, and authigenic rutile-ilmenite-titanite. In addition, the core of alunite and jarosite, from these two systems, results enriched in PO 4 3-, clearly suggesting hypogene hydrothermal origin. Santa Cesarea Terme, Capo Palinuro, and Acqua Mintina caves show important native sulfur deposits, which abundantly cover walls, ceilings, and speleothems. Abundant copiapite, pickeringite, tamarugite, hexahydrate assemblages have been observed in the Calabrian systems; their association with pyrite and hematite would suggest they formed in very acidic conditions with pH ranging between 0 and 4.

show abstract

Tectonic systems and the deposition of iron-formation

Cited by 92 publications

References 15 publications

Iron formations: A global record of Neoarchaean to Palaeoproterozoic environmental history

Iron formations: A global record of Neoarchaean to Palaeoproterozoic environmental history

Palaeoproterozoic supercontinents and global evolution: correlations from core to atmosphere

New insights on secondary minerals from Italian sulfuric acid caves

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About