“…This apparent association between Rift environments and finds of early hominins has given rise to the notion that there may be a causal relationship between the two phenomena, with the distinctive dynamics of rifting acting as a key agent in evolutionary change through one of three possible processes: (1) directly at a macro-geographical and temporal scale through the introduction of major barriers that have served to isolate populations along divergent evolutionary pathways (vicariance hypotheses, Coppens, 1994;Lewin & Foley, 2004); (2) indirectly by amplifying spatial and temporal variability in climate and vegetation (hypotheses of mosaic environments and variability selection, Potts, 1996Potts, , 1998Kingston, 2007;Maslin et al, 2014;Trauth & Maslin, 2009); or (3) directly but at a more localised spatio-temporal scale by the creation of a complex and dynamic regional topography that afforded opportunities for the evolution of the distinctive human niche with its emphasis on meat-eating, bipedalism and an extended period of juvenile dependency (the complex topography hypothesis or tectonic landscape model, King & Bailey, 2006;Winder et al, 2013). However, establishing robust correlations between environmental variables, especially features of the physical landscape, and distributions of fossil or archaeological sites has well-known difficulties: of accurately reconstructing ancient landscape features in regions subject to ongoing geological change; of biases introduced by differential deposition, preservation, exposure and discovery of bones and stones; of chronological correlation between disparate and stratigraphically unrelated features; and of integrating processes that operate over widely divergent spatio-temporal scales.…”